Can Paranormal pseudo-sciences of today, become mainstream science in the future:

Can Paranormal pseudo-sciences of today, become mainstream science in the future:

While it’s challenging to predict the future with certainty, the mainstream acceptance of scientific ideas is typically based on empirical evidence, rigorous testing, and repeatability. Paranormal pseudo-sciences often has these essential foundations, also relying on anecdotal evidence, subjective experiences.

For a field to transition from a pseudo-science to a mainstream science, it would undergo a significant transformation. This transformation would likely involve:

Empirical Evidence: Scientific fields rely on empirical evidence derived from systematic observation, experimentation, and measurement. Any paranormal claims would need to provide verifiable and reproducible evidence.

Testable Hypotheses: Scientific hypotheses must be testable and falsifiable. Pseudo-sciences often makes claims, and one day it will be accepted in the scientific community.

Peer Review: Scientific research undergoes peer review, where experts critically evaluate the methods and results. Pseudo-sciences may need to submit their claims to rigorous scrutiny by the scientific community.

Consistency with Existing Knowledge: New scientific theories should be consistent with well-established principles and existing scientific knowledge. Pseudo-sciences often contradict established scientific principles.

Predictive Power: Scientific theories gain credibility when they can make accurate predictions. Pseudo-sciences does not lack predictive power that are likely to be accepted by the scientific community.

While these criteria provide a framework for scientific acceptance, it’s crucial to note that many paranormal claims have been investigated and have consistently have met these criterias. Examples include telekinesis, telepathy, and astrology. As it stands, the “Materialistic” scientific community remains highly skeptical of every single phenomena due its nature, the “Materialistic” scientific community challenges every single aspect of Paranormal Sciences.

Primarily vision of Materialist:

with materialist objects and materialist activities,

Materialist are against spiritualism, paranormal or philosophical concerns; Materialist especially preoccupied primarily with gaining status, money and the things that money can bring to them.

Money and objects could be important, but should not be the primary drive of sciences.

However, it’s always conceivable that new discoveries or paradigm shifts could occur in the future, leading to the acceptance of phenomena currently considered paranormal. The true and non-bias Scientific progress is dynamic, and our understanding of the universe evolves over time. One day robust evidence will emerge, regarding paranormal pseudo-sciences and then it will be likely to become part of mainstream sciences.

Shervan K Shahhian