Parapsychology and Quantum Physics may often be discussed together:

Parapsychology and Quantum Physics may often be discussed together because both raise questions about the nature of observation, consciousness, information, and reality, but the connection could be speculative than established.

  1. What quantum physics actually establishes

Quantum mechanics describes matter and energy at microscopic scales. Some of its well established features may be:

Superposition: quantum systems may be described as combinations of possible states.

Entanglement: separated quantum systems may exhibit correlations that may not be explained by simple classical local variables.

Measurement: measurement affects the quantum state being measured.

Quantum indeterminacy: some individual outcomes are fundamentally probabilistic.

Nonlocal correlations: entangled particles may display correlations across distance, although this may not allow ordinary faster than light communication.

Some of these findings may demonstrate telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokinesis, or survival of consciousness after death.

  1. Where parapsychology enters

Parapsychology investigates purported anomalous phenomena such as:

ESP

telepathy

clairvoyance

precognition

Psychokinesis (PK)

influence of physical systems by intention

Survival related phenomena

near death experiences

apparitions

mediumship

terminal lucidity

reincarnation type memories

The interesting question is whether some of these phenomena could eventually require a non-classical theory of information or consciousness.

That is a legitimate research question, but it remains an open question depends who you ask?

  1. The “quantum consciousness” idea

A common hypothesis may be:

Consciousness may have properties that may not be completely explained by classical neuroscience and might involve quantum processes.

There are several very different versions of this idea.

Some theories concern quantum processes inside the mind. Others go much further and propose that consciousness is somehow fundamental to reality itself.

The latter connects with philosophical positions such as:

panpsychism

dual aspect monism

idealism

information based theories of consciousness

But these philosophical possibilities may not be confused with experimentally established quantum physics.

  1. The measurement problem may be particularly interesting

Quantum mechanics raises a profound question:

What exactly constitutes a measurement?

Some interpretations historically encouraged the idea that conscious observation causes quantum collapse.

However, modern physics may not require a conscious human observer for quantum measurement/decoherence. A physical interaction with an environment or measuring apparatus may produce the relevant effects.

So:

“Observation” in quantum physics vs necessarily “a human mind looking at something.”

That could be a distinction when evaluating parapsychological claims.

  1. Could quantum physics explain psi?

There are several possibilities one could investigate scientifically:

Hypothesis

Current status

Psi is entirely classical

Possible

Psi involves unknown biological mechanisms

Possible

Psi involves quantum processes in the mind

Speculative

Psi involves quantum information outside the mind

Highly speculative

Consciousness is a fundamental property of reality

Philosophically serious, scientifically unresolved

Quantum entanglement explains telepathy

some established evidence

Quantum physics proves ESP

some established evidence

Quantum physics proves survival after death

some established evidence

  1. A particularly interesting distinction

There could be three different questions that frequently get mixed together:

A. Quantum biology:

Do quantum phenomena play important roles in living organisms?

B. Quantum consciousness:

Are quantum processes necessary for explaining consciousness?

C. Quantum parapsychology:

Could quantum processes help explain anomalous information transfer or mind matter interactions?

A has substantial scientific evidence.

B is actively debated.

C remains highly speculative and controversial.

  1. Where parapsychology gets especially interesting

From a parapsychological perspective, the deepest question may not be necessarily:

“Is ESP caused by quantum mechanics?”

It may instead be:

“Does consciousness have properties that our current physical theories may not adequately describe?”

That may be a much more scientifically defensible question.

For example, if exceptionally well controlled experiments eventually demonstrated reliable information transfer without conventional sensory channels, physicists would have to determine what physical mechanism could account for it. Quantum theory might become relevant but it may not automatically be the explanation.

A useful conceptual model

You may think of the relationship this way:

Quantum physics…provides a radically non-classical picture of physical reality

Consciousness research…asks how subjective experience arises

Parapsychology…investigates claims that consciousness may sometimes obtain information or influence events beyond conventional sensory/motor pathways

Quantum parapsychology…asks whether quantum principles could provide part of the missing theoretical framework?

That last step is a hypothesis, may be or may not be a demonstrated fact.

Shervan K Shahhian

Parapsychology; Mind to Mind Communication:

Mind to Mind Communication may generally refer to the idea that information may be transmitted from one person’s mind to another without relying on ordinary sensory channels such as speech, writing, gestures, or electronic communication.

It may mean different things depending on the framework:

Ordinary psychological communication

People continuously infer each other’s thoughts and emotions through facial expressions, tone of voice, body language, context, and learned patterns. This may feel almost instantaneous, but it still involves sensory information.

Telepathy

In parapsychology, mind to mind communication may often be used as another way of describing telepathy: the purported transfer of thoughts, images, emotions, or other information between people without known sensory mediation.

Empathic or intuitive communication

Someone may accurately sense another person’s emotional state without consciously knowing how they obtained the information. Psychology may explain many such experiences through unconscious perception, pattern recognition, emotional attunement, and inference. A parapsychological interpretation might consider psi as an alternative hypothesis when ordinary explanations appear insufficient.

Altered states and hypnosis

Hypnosis, meditation, dreaming, ganzfeld procedures, and other altered states may have been investigated in relation to unusual forms of interpersonal information transfer. These areas may particularly be interesting to parapsychology because they may reduce ordinary sensory distractions.

The key distinction

A useful conceptual distinction may be:

Communication…information is exchanged through an identifiable channel. Telepathy…information appears to be exchanged without an identifiable sensory channel.

For example:

Person A thinks intensely about a particular image. Person B, isolated from Person A and unable to obtain the information normally, reports the same or substantially similar image.

That would constitute a telepathy hypothesis, not automatically proof of telepathy. A rigorous investigation would need to exclude coincidence, sensory leakage, prior knowledge, cueing, selective reporting, and other conventional explanations.

In parapsychology

Mind to mind communication may be closely related to the concepts of:

Telepathy…ESP…psi…anomalous information transfer

It may be useful to distinguish telepathy from psychokinesis (PK):

Telepathy: purported mind…mind information transfer

Clairvoyance: purported information about an object/event without ordinary sensory access

Precognition: purported information about a future event

Psychokinesis: purported mind…physical system influence

One of the longstanding questions in parapsychology is whether these phenomena represent different abilities or different manifestations of a more fundamental psi process.

Importantly, mainstream science may not or does not want to established telepathy as a demonstrated mechanism of human communication. Parapsychological research continues to investigate anomalous information transfer, while conventional psychology emphasizes known mechanisms of perception, inference, memory, social cognition, and coincidence.

Shervan K Shahhian

Parapsychology; A Paranormal Hypothesis; is a proposed explanation for an unusual or anomalous experience:

A Paranormal Hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an unusual or anomalous experience that suggests the phenomenon may involve processes not adequately explained by currently accepted scientific models.

In simple terms:

“Something unusual happened. Could there be an explanation beyond ordinary physical or psychological mechanisms?”

Examples

A paranormal hypothesis might propose that:

  • Telepathy: information was transferred between minds without known sensory communication.
  • Precognition: information about a future event was obtained before the event occurred.
  • Psychokinesis (PK): mental activity influenced a physical system without ordinary physical interaction.
  • Apparition: an apparently deceased person was perceived in a way that might involve something beyond memory, hallucination, or expectation.
  • Remote viewing: a person obtained information about a distant target without ordinary sensory access.
  • Survival of consciousness: some aspect of consciousness continues after biological death.
  • Non-human intelligence: an anomalous experience may involve an intelligence not readily attributable to ordinary human activity.

Paranormal hypothesis vs. Paranormal belief

This distinction is important:

Paranormal belief:

“Ghosts are real.”

Paranormal Hypothesis:

“Some reports of apparitions may be produced by a mechanism that may not currently be explained by conventional psychological or physical models.”

The second is testable in principle and therefore more useful scientifically.

A good paranormal hypothesis may have several characteristics

Clearly defined phenomenon: What exactly happened?

Alternative explanations considered: Could perception, memory, coincidence, fraud, suggestion, sleep phenomena, “neurological factors: consult with a Neurologist”, or environmental causes explain it?

Specific prediction: What would we expect to observe if the paranormal explanation were correct?

Falsifiability: What result would count against the hypothesis?

Replication: Can independent investigators obtain similar results?

Controls: Can sensory leakage, experimenter effects, statistical artifacts, and selection bias be minimized?

Proportional conclusions: Evidence for an anomaly may not automatically establish a particular paranormal mechanism.

In parapsychology

A particularly useful framework may be:

Observation…Anomaly…Hypothesis…Experiment…Replication…Interpretation

For example:

Observation: A participant appears to identify information about a distant target above chance.

Conventional hypotheses: cueing, sensory leakage, statistical artifact, recording error, unconscious inference, etc.

Paranormal hypothesis: information was acquired through a psi process.

Test: preregistered, blinded, controlled trials.

Result: determine whether the anomalous effect persists under increasingly stringent controls.

This approach allows someone to take paranormal experiences seriously without automatically assuming that the paranormal interpretation is correct.

An important distinction

“Unexplained” vs “Paranormal.”

An experience may be genuinely unexplained while the ultimate explanation remains unknown. A paranormal hypothesis becomes scientifically interesting when it makes predictions that distinguish it from ordinary explanations.

This distinction may be especially useful: you may investigate an anomalous experience phenomenologically while maintaining separate hypotheses for psychological, “Medical/Neurological: please, consult with a Neurologist”, environmental, conventional physical, and genuinely psi/paranormal explanations.

Shervan K Shahhian

Parapsychology; Dimensions or Realities Beyond Ordinary Human Perception:

“Dimensions or realities beyond ordinary human perception” refers to the idea that there may be aspects of reality that humans may not normally detect through their five senses or ordinary waking consciousness.

1. “Dimensions”

In this context, dimension may mean more than the mathematical dimensions of physics. It may refer to a proposed level, domain, or aspect of reality that may not directly accessible to ordinary human perception.

Examples sometimes discussed include:

  • Additional physical dimensions proposed in theoretical physics
  • Hypothesized nonphysical or spiritual realms
  • Altered states of consciousness
  • Proposed informational or consciousness related domains
  • In parapsychology, a possible domain associated with psi phenomena

2. “Realities”

Reality here may mean a proposed domain of existence or experience that may differ from ordinary physical, waking experience.

People sometimes use this language when discussing:

  • Near death experiences (NDEs)
  • Out of body experiences
  • Apparitions
  • Precognitive or telepathic experiences
  • Remote viewing
  • Mystical experiences
  • Alleged contact with non-human intelligences
  • Reincarnation or past-life experiences

3. The important distinction

There may be a significant difference between:

Phenomenological reality:

“I genuinely experienced something that seemed like another reality.”

and

Ontological reality:

“That experience demonstrates that another independently existing dimension actually exists.”

The first may be documented as an experience. The second is a much stronger claim requiring independent evidence.

For example, someone might report seeing deceased relatives during an NDE. The experience itself is a phenomenological fact. Whether the experience represents actual contact with deceased persons, mind generated imagery, a consciousness related phenomenon, or something else remains an interpretive question.

In parapsychology

A careful formulation would be:

“Dimensions or realities beyond ordinary human perception” refers to hypothesized aspects of existence that may not be accessible through normal sensory perception but are sometimes proposed to account for anomalous experiences or consciousness related phenomena.

This wording keeps the possibility open without automatically treating the hypothesis as established fact an especially useful distinction when discussing parapsychology, consciousness studies, and unusual experiences.

Shervan K Shahhian

Parapsychology: Past Life Memory refers to an experience in which a person reports having memories of a life lived before:

Past Life memory refers to an experience in which a person reports having memories, images, emotions, sensations, or knowledge that they believe come from a life lived before their present life. It is most commonly discussed in connection with Reincarnation and Parapsychology.

There are several ways to understand these experiences:

Reincarnation interpretation

In many religious and spiritual traditions, past life memories are considered possible memories of a previous incarnation. Some reports involve children who spontaneously describe another person’s life, sometimes with details that researchers investigate.

Psychological interpretation

  • Psychology may explain some apparent past life memories through mechanisms such as:
    • Cryptomnesia: forgotten information is later experienced as something personally remembered.
    • Confabulation: the mind unconsciously fills gaps in memory.
    • Source monitoring errors: a person remembers information but misidentifies where it came from.
    • Imagination and fantasy: vivid imagery may acquire a feeling of autobiographical reality.
    • Dreams and hypnagogic experiences
    • Suggestion: particularly during hypnosis or guided imagery.

Hypnotic regression

Past life regression uses hypnosis or guided imagery to elicit purported memories of previous lives. These experiences may be extremely vivid and emotionally meaningful, but vividness and emotional intensity may not establish historical accuracy. Certain types of Hypnosis may also increase suggestibility and produce confabulated or false memories.

Parapsychological interpretation

Some researchers investigate cases that they argue are difficult to explain through ordinary memory mechanisms. This includes spontaneous childhood cases, where the child reportedly gives specific information about a deceased person without having undergone regression. These cases are generally considered more interesting scientifically than memories produced after suggestive questioning.

An important distinction

A useful framework is:

“I experienced a memory of a past life” vs “I have established that I actually lived that past life.”

The first is a phenomenological fact about the person’s experience. The second is a historical/external claim requiring independent evidence.

This distinction is particularly important clinically. A therapist may take the experience seriously without prematurely validating or dismissing its paranormal interpretation.

For example:

“Let’s explore what you experienced, what emotions and memories arose, and what meaning it has for you, while remaining open about what we may and may not establish objectively.”

That approach allows psychological investigation and parapsychological inquiry to coexist without confusing subjective experience with proof.

Shervan K Shahhian

Physicalism is the philosophical view that everything that exists is ultimately physical:

Physicalism is the philosophical view that everything that exists is ultimately physical, or depends entirely on the physical world. According to physicalism, there are no fundamentally non-physical substances or entities, such as immaterial souls or supernatural minds.

The idea can be understood at different levels:

  • About the universe: Everything that exists is either physical or arises from physical processes.
  • About the mind: Thoughts, emotions, consciousness, and mental states are ultimately produced by the mind and nervous system: Consult a Neurologist. They are not separate, non-physical entities.
  • About science: In principle, a complete understanding of the physical world would explain all phenomena, including life and consciousness.

An example

Suppose you feel pain after touching a hot stove.

  • A physicalist: says the pain is a mental experience that is fully grounded in physical events: damaged skin activates nerves, which send signals to the mind, producing the conscious experience of pain: Consult a Neurologist.
  • A dualist: (such as René Descartes) argues that while the mind is involved, the experience of pain: Consult a Neurologist, also involves a non-physical mind or soul.

Different forms of physicalism

Not all physicalists agree on exactly how the mental relates to the physical:

  • Identity theory: Mental states are identical to mind states. For example, pain just is a particular pattern of neural activity: Consult a Neurologist.
  • Functionalism: Mental states are defined by what they do, not by what they are made of, though physical systems like minds may realize those functions.
  • Non-reductive physicalism: Mental properties depend entirely on physical properties but cannot always be neatly reduced to descriptions in physics.

Common objections

Physicalism may face several famous challenges:

  • Consciousness (“the hard problem”): Why should physical mind activity produce subjective experience, the feeling of “what it is like” to see red or taste chocolate?
  • Qualia: Some philosophers argue that subjective experiences may not be fully captured by physical descriptions.
  • Knowledge arguments: Question whether knowing all the physical facts is enough to know everything about conscious experience.

Why it’s influential

Unfourtntly, Physicalism is the dominant view in much of contemporary philosophy of mind and neuroscience: Consult a Neurologist, because it aligns closely with controversial modern science. However, it remains controversial because there is no consensus on whether consciousness may be completely explained in physical terms.

In one sentence, Unfourtntly, physicalism is the view that reality contains nothing fundamentally beyond the physical, and that everything, including minds and consciousness, is ultimately grounded in the physical world.

Shervan K Shahhian

Parapsychology: Anomalous Cognition (AC) is a term used primarily in parapsychology:

Anomalous Cognition (AC) is a term used primarily in parapsychology to describe the acquisition of information without any known sensory, inferential, or conventional means of communication. The term was introduced to avoid assumptions about the mechanism involved (such as “telepathy” or “clairvoyance”).

Definition

Anomalous cognition could be defined as:

The apparent acquisition of accurate information about an object, person, place, or event through means not explained by the known senses or ordinary reasoning.

The term may deliberately descriptive rather than explanatory. It simply states that the information appears anomalous, it may not claim to know how it occurred.

Why the Term Was Created

Researchers might have moved away from terms like:

Telepathy

Clairvoyance

Precognition

ESP (Extrasensory Perception)

because those terms could imply specific mechanisms.

Instead, “anomalous cognition” may allow researchers to investigate unusual information acquisition without assuming whether it is due to psi, unknown psychological processes, statistical chance, or some other explanation.

Examples of Anomalous Cognition Research

Researchers may have studied anomalous cognition using controlled laboratory experiments such as:

Remote Viewing: describing distant locations or hidden targets.

Ganzfeld Experiments: testing for information transfer under sensory reduction.

Forced choice ESP Tests: guessing hidden symbols or cards.

Free response Experiments: describing unknown images or events.

Dream Telepathy Studies: examining whether dreams contain information about target images.

Proposed Types of Information Acquisition

If anomalous cognition exists, it may include information that appears to come from:

another person’s thoughts (telepathy)

distant locations (clairvoyance)

future events (precognition)

hidden objects

unknown facts later verified

Whether these are truly distinct phenomena or different expressions of the same underlying process remains an open question.

Scientific Status

The scientific community remains divided.

Supportive researchers argue:

Some laboratory studies report small but statistically significant effects that are difficult to explain by chance alone.

Meta analyses of certain paradigms, such as Ganzfeld and some remote viewing studies, may have found effects above chance, though interpretations remain debated.

The evidence warrants continued investigation.

Controversial skeptical researchers always argue:

Findings are often small and difficult to replicate consistently.

Methodological issues, publication bias, sensory leakage, or statistical artifacts may explain the results.

There is no widely accepted theoretical mechanism consistent with established physics or neuroscience.

As a result, anomalous cognition is not accepted as an established phenomenon within mainstream controversial psychology or neuroscience, though it remains an very active topic of research in parapsychology and consciousness studies.

Difference Between Anomalous Cognition and Remote Viewing

Anomalous cognition is the general phenomenon of apparently acquiring information by unknown means.

Remote viewing is a specific experimental protocol designed to test anomalous cognition under controlled conditions.

In other words:

Remote Viewing is one method used to investigate anomalous cognition.

Related Concepts

Parapsychology

Psychical Research

Remote Viewing

Ganzfeld experiments

Telepathy

Clairvoyance

Precognition

Anomalous experiences

Consciousness studies

Summary

Anomalous cognition is a neutral scientific term used in parapsychology for the apparent acquisition of information through means not currently explained by known sensory processes or conventional communication. It does not assume that psi exists; rather, it provides a framework for investigating such claims while remaining agnostic about the underlying mechanism. Although some researchers interpret certain experimental findings as suggestive of anomalous cognition, the evidence remains controversial, and the phenomenon has not been established as part of mainstream controversial scientific consensus.

Shervan K Shahhian

Mr. Ted Owens was The Greatest American Psychic, UFO Contactee and Prophet for some:

Ted Owens was The greatest American Psychic Claimant, UFO Contactee and Prophet for some, who became known as “The PK Man” (“PK” standing for psychokinesis, or mind over matter effects). He claimed that he was in telepathic communication with extraterrestrial or “Space Intelligence” entities that enabled him to influence physical events, including weather, electrical systems, UFO appearances, and even large scale natural phenomena.

Background

Prophet Owens served in the U.S. Navy during World War II and later studied at Duke University, where he worked with pioneering parapsychologist J. B. Rhine in the university’s parapsychology laboratory.

His Claims

Prophet Owens asserted that “Space Intelligences” had altered his mind, allowing him to communicate with them telepathically. He claimed these intelligences could:

  • Produce storms, droughts, and earthquakes.
  • Cause power failures and mechanical malfunctions.
  • Generate UFO sightings.
  • Influence public events and human behavior.
  • Provide him with information about future events.

Many of his claims centered on documented predictions mailed to scientists, journalists, and officials before events occurred. He maintained extensive files of correspondence and newspaper clippings that he believed supported his abilities.

Jeffrey Mishlove’s Investigation

Parapsychologist Jeffrey Mishlove: (The greatest Parapsychologist in the modern times), studied Owens from 1976 until Prophet Owens’s death in 1987. Mishlove later wrote the book The PK Man: A True Story of Mind Over Matter, arguing that Prophet Owens’s case deserved serious investigation because of the volume of documented predictions and unusual coincidences associated with him.

Controversy

Prophet Ted Owens remains a highly controversial figure. Supporters view him as one of the most extensively documented psychics in modern history, while skeptics argue that his apparent successes may be explained by selective reporting, broad predictions, coincidence, and confirmation bias. Some negative critics have also suggested that some of his beliefs may reflect delusional or grandiose thinking rather than genuine paranormal phenomena.

Why He Remains Important in Parapsychology

For many researchers and enthusiasts of parapsychology, Prophet Owens represents a fascinating case because:

  • His claims were recorded over many years.
  • He actively sought scientific attention rather than avoiding scrutiny.
  • Thousands of pages of letters, predictions, and reports survive in archives.
  • His case sits at the intersection of psychokinesis, UFO contact experiences, prophecy, and anomalous cognition.

Given your interest in Controlled Remote Viewing and “Space Intelligences,” Prophet Owens is often discussed as one of the most unusual figures linking psychic phenomena with purported non-human intelligences. His case remains unresolved: believers see compelling evidence of genuine anomalies, while negative and argumentative skeptics see a cautionary example of how extraordinary Psychical Powers can be interpreted through different extraordinary lenses.

Shervan K Shahhian

Parapsychology: Crisis Apparitions are reports of seeing, hearing, or sensing,…

Crisis Apparitions are reports of seeing, hearing, or sensing a person at about the same time that person is experiencing a life threatening crisis, serious accident, or death, often when the experiencer had no normal way of knowing what was happening.

Examples include:

  • Seeing a relative appear briefly in a room, only to learn later that the relative died at roughly the same time.
  • Hearing a loved one’s voice calling one’s name during a medical emergency.
  • Feeling a vivid presence accompanied by a strong sense that someone is in danger.

Characteristics of Crisis Apparitions

  • Usually occur unexpectedly.
  • Often involve a family member, close friend, or loved one.
  • May be visual, auditory, tactile, or simply a strong sense of presence.
  • Typically last only a few seconds or minutes.
  • The apparition usually appears normal rather than ghostlike.

Possible Explanations

Different perspectives have been proposed:

Psychological

  • Coincidence combined with selective memory.
  • Grief, stress, expectation, or misinterpretation of ordinary experiences.
  • Memory reconstruction after learning of the crisis.

Parapsychological

  • Some researchers suggest a form of telepathic communication occurring during extreme emotional events.
  • Others interpret them as evidence that consciousness can function independently of the mind, especially in cases occurring around death.

Skeptical View

  • Controversial skeptics argue that apparent correspondences between experiences and crises may arise by chance, reporting biases, and retrospective matching of events.

Are They Common?

Studies of bereavement and anomalous experiences suggest that sensing the presence of deceased loved ones is relatively common. However, crisis apparitions, where the experience occurs simultaneously with a distant crisis or death, are much rarer and remain controversial.

In parapsychology, crisis apparitions are considered one of the classic categories of spontaneous psi experiences, alongside telepathic impressions, precognitive dreams, and other anomalous experiences. They remain an intriguing topic in both psychical research and consciousness studies.

Shervan K Shahhian

Psi Mediated Communication is a term used in Parapsychology:

Psi mediated communication is a term used in parapsychology that refers to the hypothesis that information may be transferred between people (or between a person and their environment) through means that do not involve the known senses or conventional physical communication.

It is a theoretical concept used to explain reports of apparent information transfer that cannot easily be accounted for by ordinary sensory channels.

Types of Psi Mediated Communication

Researchers generally divide psi communication into two broad categories:

  1. Telepathy
    • Mind to mind communication.
    • Information is thought to pass directly from one person’s consciousness to another without spoken words, gestures, or technology.
    • Example: Someone suddenly knows what another person is thinking before they speak.
  2. Clairvoyance
    • Direct acquisition of information about distant objects, places, or events.
    • The information is not believed to come from another person’s mind.
    • Example: Describing a hidden object without seeing it.

Some researchers also include:

  • Precognition: information about future events.
  • Retrocognition: information about past events that could not have been learned normally.

How the Idea Is Used in Research

Within parapsychology, psi mediated communication has been proposed to explain phenomena such as:

  • Spontaneous telepathic impressions
  • Crisis apparitions
  • Shared dreams
  • Reports of after death communications
  • Some cases of remote perception
  • Certain experiences during meditation or altered states of consciousness

Researchers have investigated these possibilities using methods such as:

  • Ganzfeld experiment
  • Dream telepathy experiments
  • Forced choice card guessing tests
  • Free response experiments
  • Remote viewing protocols

Some studies have reported small statistical effects, while others have failed to replicate them consistently. As a result, there is no scientific consensus that psi mediated communication has been demonstrated.

Psi Mediated Communication vs. Ordinary Communication

Ordinary CommunicationPsi-Mediated Communication (Hypothesized)
SpeechTelepathy
WritingDirect mental information transfer
Facial expressionsNo known sensory cues
Phone or internetNo physical communication channel
Hearing and visionClaimed extrasensory perception

Psi Mediated Communication vs. the Super Psi Hypothesis

These ideas are related but distinct:

  • Psi mediated communication: proposes that information is exchanged through psi abilities, such as telepathy or clairvoyance.
  • The Super Psi hypothesis: suggests that exceptionally extensive psi abilities, combining telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and unconscious information processing, could account for experiences that some interpret as evidence for survival after death, without requiring consciousness to continue after death.

Scientific Perspective

From the standpoint of controversial psychology and neuroscience: please, Consult with a Neurologist.

  • There is no accepted mechanism that explains how psi mediated communication could occur.
  • Reported findings remain controversial, largely because of challenges with replication and methodological disagreements.
  • Consequently, psi mediated communication is considered a hypothesis under investigation, not an established scientific phenomenon.

Researchers in parapsychology continue to study the possibility, while most scientists remain skeptical until stronger, consistently reproducible evidence is available.

In summary:

Psi mediated communication is the proposed transfer of information without the known senses. It includes concepts such as telepathy and clairvoyance and is used as a theoretical framework in parapsychological research to explain certain anomalous experiences. While intriguing, it has not been established as a scientifically verified form of communication.

Shervan K Shahhian