consciousness – Page 2 – LIBERTY PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Bereavement Visions in Parapsychology Research, explained:

Bereavement visions are one of the studied forms of after-death related anomalous experiences in parapsychology. Researchers examine them as possible perceptual experiences of the deceased occurring after death, usually reported by grieving individuals.

1. What Bereavement Visions Are

In parapsychology, bereavement visions are experiences in which a grieving person perceives the deceased as present. These perceptions can include:

Visual apparitions (seeing the deceased person)
Auditory experiences (hearing their voice)
Tactile sensations (feeling a touch or embrace)
Sense of presence
Dream encounters with vivid realism

These are often grouped under After‑Death Communications (ADCs).

Typical characteristics reported in research:

Occur spontaneously
Usually happen within the first year after death
Are often comforting rather than frightening
Individuals usually remain psychologically stable

2. Classic Parapsychology Research

One of the earliest major investigations came from the Society for Psychical Research (SPR).

Findings:

Thousands of reports of apparitions and crisis experiences were collected.
Some reports occurred close to the time of death of the person seen.
Researchers proposed the possibility of telepathic hallucinations.

3. Modern Bereavement Vision Research

Modern parapsychology approaches the phenomenon more systematically.

Many have Researched

Some of the research has documented thousands of cases.

Findings:

ADCs occur across cultures and religions
Most experiencers report psychological comfort
Many experiences involve clear sensory perception

4. Bereavement Vision Research in Psychology

Psychological researchers also studied these experiences without assuming a paranormal explanation.

A study was conducted that:

Some studied widows and widowers and found:

Some reported sensing or seeing the deceased spouse
Most participants did not consider themselves mentally ill

This suggested bereavement visions are relatively common in normal grief.

5. How Parapsychology Interprets Bereavement Visions

Parapsychologists generally consider four explanatory models.

1. Survival Model

The experience is interpreted as actual communication from the deceased.

2. Psi or Super-Psi Model

Related to the Super-Psi Theory:

The living person unconsciously gathers information via telepathy or clairvoyance
The mind constructs the experience.

3. Psychological Model

The experience arises from grief-related cognitive and emotional processes.

4. Hybrid Model

Some researchers think multiple mechanisms may operate simultaneously.

6. Typical Characteristics of Bereavement Visions

Parapsychological case collections consistently report:

Occur during quiet states or transitions (sleep/waking)
The apparition often appears healthy and peaceful
Messages are usually brief and reassuring
The experience ends abruptly

These features differentiate them from clinical hallucinations associated with psychiatric disorders.

7. Why Bereavement Visions Interest Parapsychologists

They are important because they potentially relate to the survival of consciousness hypothesis.

Researchers view them as valuable because they:

occur spontaneously
often involve ordinary individuals
can sometimes contain veridical information

In summary:
Bereavement visions are reported experiences in which the bereaved perceive the deceased. Parapsychology studies them as possible after-death communications, psi phenomena, or grief-related experiences, while psychology often interprets them as normal features of the grieving process.

Shervan K Shahhian

Tactile Hallucinations, explained:

Tactile hallucinations (also called haptic hallucinations) are false sensations of touch that occur without any external physical stimulus. A person genuinely feels something on or under their skin even though nothing is actually there.

In clinical psychology and psychiatry, tactile hallucinations might be classified as a type of somatic sensory hallucination.

Common Types of Tactile Hallucinations

People may report sensations such as:

• Bugs crawling on the skin (called formication)
• Something touching or tapping the body
• Burning or electric sensations
• Pressure or being grabbed
• Feeling something moving under the skin
• Water dripping or wind blowing on the skin

The experience can feel extremely real because the brain’s sensory cortex is producing the perception.

Conditions Associated With Tactile Hallucinations

In clinical contexts they may appear in several conditions:

1. Psychiatric Disorders

Common in:

Schizophrenia
Delusional Parasitosis
Severe Major Depressive Disorder with psychotic features

2. Substance Use or Withdrawal

Tactile hallucinations might occur during intoxication or withdrawal from substances such as:

Cocaine
Methamphetamine
Alcohol (especially during withdrawal or delirium tremens)

3. Neurological Conditions

CONSULT WITH A NEUROLOGIST

They might also occur in neurological disorders

Psychological vs Neurological Mechanism

CONSULT WITH A NEUROLOGIST

From a neuroscience perspective, CONSULT WITH A NEUROLOGIST, tactile hallucinations are thought to involve abnormal activation of the somatosensory cortex, the brain area responsible for touch perception.

Normally:

Stimulus: skin receptors: brain: touch perception, CONSULT WITH A NEUROLOGIST

In hallucinations:

Brain activity: perceived touch without stimulus, CONSULT WITH A NEUROLOGIST

Parapsychology Perspective

Some researchers have suggested other interpretations in certain anomalous experiences.

Some investigators discussed the possibility that certain tactile sensations in spontaneous cases might involve psychokinetic or psi-related processes, although this remains controversial and not widely accepted in mainstream science.

In the Super-Psi / Living Agent Psi model, unusual physical sensations might theoretically be produced unconsciously by psi processes rather than external spirits.

Key Point:
Tactile hallucinations are perceptions of touch without a physical cause, and they can arise from psychiatric, neurological, substance-related, or occasionally anomalous experiential contexts.

Shervan K Shahhian

Religious Hallucinations, explained:

Religious hallucinations could be sensory experiences involving religious or spiritual content that occur without an external stimulus. The person could believe they are hearing, seeing, or feeling a divine or supernatural presence.

CONSULT WITH A PSYCHIATRIST

These experiences might occur in psychiatric disorders, extreme stress, bereavement, or sometimes in intense religious states. Because you study psychology and parapsychology, this topic is interesting since the two fields often interpret them very differently.

1. What Religious Hallucinations Look Like

They might involve religious figures, voices, or supernatural entities.

Common examples could include:

Auditory

Hearing the voice of God
Hearing angels or demons speaking
Commands believed to come from a divine source

Visual

Seeing Jesus, angels, saints, or demons
Visions of heaven, hell, or divine light

Tactile / Somatic

Feeling touched by a spiritual being
Sensation of possession or spiritual energy entering the body

Olfactory

Smelling incense, sulfur, or sacred fragrances without a source

2. Conditions Where They Commonly Occur

In clinical psychology, religious hallucinations might appear in several disorders:

Psychotic Disorders

Might commonly appear in

Schizophrenia
Schizoaffective Disorder

Some Typical features:

Commanding voices
Religious delusions (e.g., believing one is a prophet or chosen by God)

Mood Disorders with Psychosis

Such as:

Bipolar Disorder (during manic episodes)
Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features

Example:

Hearing God condemning or judging them.

Neurological Conditions

CONSULT WITH A NEOUROLOGIST

Temporal-lobe disturbances are especially associated with intense mystical or religious visions.

3. Cultural and Religious Context

Some psychologists might emphasize that culture strongly shapes hallucination content.

For example:

Christians may see Jesus or angels
Hindus may see deities

The brain might often use the person’s belief system to interpret unusual sensory experiences.

4. Difference Between Religious Experience and Hallucination

Some Psychologists might usually distinguish them by several criteria.

Healthy Religious Experience	Religious Hallucination
Occurs during prayer or meditation	Occurs spontaneously
Person retains critical thinking	Person believes it absolutely
Not distressing or commanding	Often commanding or frightening
Does not impair functioning	Often disrupts life

5. Parapsychological Interpretations

In parapsychology, some researchers might argue that not all such experiences are pathological.

Two interpretations sometimes maybe discussed:

Psi-mediated perception: (telepathy/clairvoyance)
Super-Psi / Living Agent Psi model: unconscious psychic abilities producing the experience.

This perspective could be discussed by researchers at the
Society for Psychical Research and the
Parapsychological Association.

However, mainstream science still treats most of these cases as psychological or neurological phenomena.

In summary:
Religious hallucinations are sensory experiences with spiritual content that occur without an external source. Clinically they are often linked to psychosis, neurological disorders, or extreme emotional states, while parapsychology sometimes explores non-ordinary interpretations.

Shervan K Shahhian

Bereavement-Related Anomalous Experiences, what are they:

Bereavement-Related Anomalous Experiences (BRAEs) could be unusual perceptual or psychological experiences reported by people after the death of a loved one. They could be widely discussed in both clinical bereavement research and Parapsychology. These experiences might often feel very real and meaningful to the bereaved person.

What They Are

Bereavement-related anomalous experiences could be subjective experiences in which a grieving person perceives contact, presence, or communication from the deceased.

They typically occur during the early stages of grief but may also appear years later.

Some researchers in grief psychology might sometimes call them After-Death Communications (ADCs).

Common Types of Bereavement Experiences

1. Sense of Presence

A person feels the deceased nearby even though no one is physically there.

Examples:

Feeling the loved one sitting beside them
Sensing someone in the room
Feeling watched over

2. Visual Experiences

Seeing the deceased briefly or in dreams.

Examples:

Seeing the loved one standing in the room
A vivid waking vision
Extremely realistic dreams of the deceased

These are sometimes called grief visions.

3. Auditory Experiences

Hearing the voice of the deceased.

Examples:

Hearing their name called
Hearing them speak a brief message

4. Tactile Experiences

Physical sensations associated with the deceased.

Examples:

Feeling a touch on the shoulder
Feeling someone sit on the bed

5. Symbolic Coincidences

Events interpreted as meaningful signs.

Examples:

Unusual animal appearances
Objects moving or appearing unexpectedly
Music associated with the deceased playing suddenly

6. Dream Encounters

Dreams where the deceased appears alive, healthy, and communicating.

Some people might report these dreams as emotionally healing rather than disturbing.

How Common Are They?

Surprisingly, they could be very common.

Studies in bereavement research might suggest:

Some of widows and widowers report at least one experience
Many people might never report them because they fear being judged

Possible Psychological Interpretation

Possibly in clinical psychology, these experiences could often explained as:

Normal grief phenomena
Memory activation and emotional processing
Attachment system responses
Temporary sensory misperceptions during intense mourning

Importantly, they may not usually be considered symptoms of mental illness unless they are persistent, distressing, or impair functioning.

Possible Interpretation in Parapsychology

Some researchers in Parapsychology might sometimes explore other possibilities:

Survival hypothesis: consciousness continues after death
Super-Psi Hypothesis: the bereaved mind unconsciously produces psi information
Psychological coping mechanisms

Some parapsychologists acknowledge that multiple explanations may coexist.

Possible, Key Characteristics

Bereavement anomalous experiences might have these traits:

Brief and spontaneous
Occur during emotional vulnerability
Feel comforting rather than frightening
Do not typically impair reality testing

Example Report

A typical report might be:

“After my husband died, I woke up one night and felt him sit on the bed and place his hand on my shoulder. I wasn’t scared, it felt comforting.”

Experiences like this might be reported cross-culturally and throughout history.

Possibly Important Clinical Perspective

Some modern grief specialists might view these experiences as:

Common
Usually healthy
Often helpful in the grieving process

Unless they become persistent hallucinations with loss of insight, they are not treated as psychiatric disorders.

Shervan K Shahhian

The Fourth Model Many Modern Parapsychologists Discuss the “Super-Psi or Living Agent Psi model”:

Many modern researchers in Parapsychology may discuss a fourth explanatory model for anomalous experiences that could be called the “Super-Psi” or “Living Agent Psi (LAP)” model. This model tries to explain phenomena that appear paranormal or spirit-related without requiring discarnate spirits or external entities.

The Super-Psi / Living Agent Psi Model

Basic idea:
All the information or effects involved in an anomalous experience come from the psychic abilities of living people, usually unconsciously.

These abilities may include:

Telepathy: mind-to-mind information transfer
Clairvoyance: acquiring information about distant or hidden events
Precognition: knowledge of future events
Psychokinesis: mental influence on physical systems

The “super” part of the theory means these abilities operate at extremely complex and powerful levels, combining all of the above simultaneously.

Why It Was Proposed

Some researchers may have noticed that some paranormal cases seemed to involve:

Accurate information about deceased people
Objects moving or disturbances (poltergeist cases)
Visions or voices that seem external
Mediumistic information

Instead of assuming spirits, the Super-Psi model suggests:

The living person’s unconscious psi gathers information from anywhere in space and time and constructs the experience.

Example

A grief apparition:
Someone sees and hears a deceased relative.

Interpretations by different models:

Psychological model: grief hallucination
Survival model: the spirit of the deceased actually appeared
Psi model: telepathic/clairvoyant perception
Super-Psi model: the experiencer’s unconscious psi accessed information about the deceased and created the full perception

Where It Is Used

The model is often discussed in research areas such as:

Apparitions
Mediumship
Poltergeist cases
Near-death and after-death communication reports

Some influential parapsychologists who possibly debated these ideas include:

J. B. Rhine
Ian Stevenson
Stephen E. Braude

Strengths of the Model

Parapsychologists might consider it attractive because it:

Explains paranormal information without requiring spirits
Uses known psi processes studied in labs
Can theoretically explain very complex cases

Main Criticism

Critics may argue the model becomes too powerful and unfalsifiable.

For example:

If unconscious psi can access any mind, any place, any time, then almost any paranormal event might be explained by Super-Psi, making it difficult to test scientifically.

Important Debate in Parapsychology

Today the biggest debate in Parapsychology could be between:

Super-Psi / Living Agent Psi theory
Survival of consciousness after death

Both might attempt to explain the same phenomena but propose very different realities.

Shervan K Shahhian

Theory of Mind, what is it:

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to understand that other people have their own thoughts, beliefs, feelings, intentions, and perspectives, which may be different from your own.

Simple Definition

It is the mental capacity to “read minds” indirectly, not literally, but by inferring what someone else might be thinking or feeling.

Key Idea

People with Theory of Mind recognize that:

Others can believe things that are false
Others have different knowledge
Others have intentions and emotions separate from theirs

Example

Imagine a husband sees that a cookie jar was moved.

Husband with Theory of Mind:
“Wife doesn’t know the jar moved, so she will look in the old place.”
Without Theory of Mind:
“Wife will look where the jar actually is because I know where it is.”

Importance

Theory of Mind is crucial for:

Empathy
Social interaction
Communication
Moral reasoning
Deception and sarcasm understanding

For example, understanding sarcasm requires recognizing that someone’s literal words differ from their actual intention.

Clinical Relevance

Difficulties with Theory of Mind are often seen in:

Autism Spectrum Disorder (CONSULT WITH A NEUROLOGIST)
Schizophrenia
Borderline Personality Disorder

These conditions may affect how a person interprets others’ intentions or emotions.

In Psychology Research

Theory of Mind could be studied in fields such as:

Developmental Psychology
Social Psychology
Cognitive Neuroscience

In short:
Theory of Mind: the ability to understand that other minds exist and think differently than yours.

Shervan K Shahhian

Spiritual & Existential Exploration, explained:

Spiritual & Existential Exploration refers to the process of deeply examining questions about meaning, purpose, identity, consciousness, and the nature of existence. It involves reflecting on both spiritual realities (transcendent or metaphysical dimensions) and existential questions (the human condition and our place in the universe).

1. Existential Exploration (Philosophical Dimension)

This focuses on fundamental questions such as:

Why do we exist?
What is the meaning of life?
What is consciousness?
What happens after death?
Do humans have free will or destiny?

2. Spiritual Exploration (Transcendent Dimension)

Spiritual exploration deals with experiences or beliefs related to:

The soul or higher self
Higher intelligence or cosmic consciousness
Mystical experiences
Life after death
Non-ordinary states of consciousness

This is often studied in fields like:

Transpersonal Psychology
Parapsychology

Practices often include:

Meditation
Mysticism
Near-death experience research
Consciousness exploration
Psi phenomena studies (remote viewing, telepathy, etc.)

3. Psychological Perspective

From a clinical or psychological viewpoint, spiritual existential exploration can involve:

Identity development
Meaning-making
Coping with mortality
Integration of mystical or anomalous experiences

It is closely related to:

Existential therapy
Logotherapy
Spiritual integration in psychotherapy

4. Common Triggers for Spiritual & Existential Exploration

People often begin this journey after:

Near-death experiences
Loss or trauma
Mystical or anomalous experiences
Deep meditation or psychedelic experiences
Scientific or philosophical curiosity about consciousness

5. Core Themes Explored

Typical themes include:

Nature of reality
Consciousness beyond the brain
Human purpose
Connection with universal intelligence
Evolution of consciousness

In advanced exploration, some individuals begin examining possibilities like:

non-local consciousness
survival of consciousness after death
contact with non-human intelligence
expanded perception abilities

These topics often appear in parapsychology and consciousness research.

In simple terms:
Spiritual & Existential Exploration is the search to understand who we really are, why we exist, and what the deeper structure of reality might be.

Shervan K Shahhian

White Line Fever, what is it:

White Line Fever, more formally known as highway hypnosis, is a psychological driving phenomenon in which a person drives a vehicle for long distances and enters a trance-like mental state. During this state, the driver may continue driving safely but has little or no conscious memory of the last few miles traveled.

Key Characteristics

Automatic Driving
- The driver operates the car automatically (steering, braking, staying in lane).
- Actions occur with minimal conscious awareness.
Reduced Awareness
- The driver may not remember passing exits, road signs, or landmarks.
Trance-Like State
- Similar to mild dissociation or automatic behavior.
- The brain shifts from active attention to a more automatic processing mode.
Monotonous Stimulus
- Long straight roads, repetitive scenery, and the rhythmic passing of white lane lines can induce the effect.

Why It Happens (Psychological Mechanism)

Highway hypnosis occurs because of:

Monotony and sensory repetition
Fatigue or reduced alertness
Overlearned behavior (driving becomes automatic)
Low cognitive stimulation

The brain moves control from conscious attention to procedural memory systems in the basal ganglia, allowing driving skills to run on “autopilot.”

Is It Dangerous?

It can be potentially dangerous because:

Reaction time may slow.
Situational awareness decreases.
The driver may fail to notice sudden hazards.

However, it is not exactly sleep. The driver is still awake but operating with reduced conscious monitoring.

Relationship to Psychological States

Highway hypnosis is often compared to:

Dissociation
Automatic behavior
Mind wandering
Absorptive trance states

Common Signs

Missing an exit without realizing it
Not remembering the last several minutes of driving
Staring blankly at the road
Feeling like you suddenly “wake up” while driving

Prevention

Take frequent breaks (every 2 hours)
Engage in conversation or listen to stimulating audio
Avoid driving when fatigued
Change posture or adjust ventilation

In psychology, highway hypnosis is considered a form of temporary dissociative attention state, not a pathological disorder.

Shervan K Shahhian

Idealism, what is it:

Idealism is a philosophical view that says reality is fundamentally mental, spiritual, or idea-based rather than purely material.

In simple terms:

What is ultimately real is mind or consciousness, not matter.

Core Idea

Materialism says:

Matter=produces mind.

Idealism says the reverse:

Mind=produces or structures what we call matter.

From an idealist perspective, the physical world is either:

Dependent on consciousness
Constructed by consciousness
Or inseparable from consciousness

Major Forms of Idealism

1. Subjective Idealism

“To be is to be perceived.”
Objects exist only insofar as they are perceived.
Reality is made of perceptions in minds.

2. Transcendental Idealism

We never know reality “as it is in itself.”
We only know reality as structured by the human mind.
Space and time are mental frameworks, not independent things.

This doesn’t deny the external world, it says we can only know it through the mind’s organizing structures.

3. Absolute Idealism

Reality is a single, unified spiritual whole.
History and consciousness unfold dialectically.
The universe is the development of Absolute Mind.

4. Modern Idealism

In contemporary philosophy of mind, some argue:

Consciousness is fundamental.
The universe may be mind-like at its base.
Physical reality could emerge from informational or mental processes.

Idealism vs. Realism vs. Materialism

View	What is fundamental?
Materialism	Matter
Dualism	Mind and matter
Idealism	Mind
Realism	Reality exists independent of mind

Psychological Meaning of “Idealism”

In everyday language, idealism also means:

Believing in high ideals
Wanting the world to match moral or spiritual standards
Optimism about human potential

That’s different from philosophical idealism, though historically connected.

Why It Matters

Idealism directly impacts questions like:

What is consciousness?
Does reality exist without observers?
Are mystical experiences glimpses of deeper structure?
Is the universe mental at its foundation?

Shervan K Shahhian

Collective Intelligence beats Solo Intelligence, why:

Because one mind is powerful… but many minds networked together become something qualitatively different.
Here’s why collective intelligence usually outperforms solo intelligence across science, psychology, organizations, and even evolution.

1. Cognitive diversity beats raw IQ

A single brilliant mind still has blind spots. Groups bring:

Different perspectives
Different heuristics and mental models
Different life experiences

This diversity allows the group to:

Catch errors faster
See patterns one person would miss
Generate more creative solutions

Research consistently shows that a diverse group of moderately intelligent people can outperform a homogenous group of high-IQ individuals.

2. Error correction through social feedback

Solo intelligence has no built-in correction system.

Groups provide:

Challenge and contradiction
Reality checks
Peer review

Think science: breakthroughs survive because they’re attacked by other minds. Collective intelligence filters nonsense better than isolation.

3. Parallel processing

One brain works serially.
Many brains work in parallel.

Groups can:

Explore multiple solution paths at once
Divide complex problems into parts
Test ideas simultaneously

This is why ant colonies, human teams, and neural networks scale so well.

4. Emergence: the whole is more than the sum

When individuals interact, new intelligence emerges:

Shared memory
Distributed expertise
Collective pattern recognition

Just like neurons form a mind, people form a meta-mind. No single neuron “understands” a thought yet thought emerges.

5. Motivation and energy amplification

Groups create:

Accountability
Emotional reinforcement
Social momentum

This boosts persistence, learning speed, and problem solving stamina things raw intelligence alone can’t sustain.

6. Evolution selected for it

Humans didn’t dominate because we were the strongest or smartest individually.
We dominated because we could:

Coordinate
Transmit knowledge across generations
Build cumulative culture

Language itself is a collective intelligence technology.

The important caveat

Collective intelligence only beats solo intelligence under the right conditions:

Psychological safety
Open dissent
No dominance by ego or hierarchy

Otherwise, groups devolve into:

Groupthink
Herd stupidity
Echo chambers

A bad collective is worse than a lone thinker.

Bottom line

Solo intelligence is depth.
Collective intelligence is depth plus breadth plus error correction plus emergence.

Shervan K Shahhian