philosophy – LIBERTY PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Psychological Free Fall, what is it:

Psychological free fall is not a formal diagnostic term, but it’s often used metaphorically to describe a sudden and destabilizing loss of psychological structure, meaning, or emotional stability.

It refers to the subjective experience of:

Losing your sense of identity
Losing your belief system or worldview
Emotional overwhelm without grounding
A collapse of certainty or control
Feeling like you are “falling” internally with nothing to hold onto

What It Feels Like

People describe it as:

“The ground disappeared under me.”
“Everything I believed is unraveling.”
“I don’t know who I am anymore.”
Intense anxiety or existential dread
Derealization or depersonalization
Sudden collapse of confidence

It can feel similar to:

An identity crisis
An existential crisis
Acute stress reaction
A depressive or anxiety episode

Common Triggers

Psychological free fall can be triggered by:

Divorce, betrayal, or relationship loss
Loss of career or status
Spiritual deconstruction
Trauma exposure
Public humiliation
Collapse of grandiosity or narcissistic defenses
Deep shadow confrontation (especially in intense self-exploration work)

This state often appears when illusions dissolve faster than the psyche can reorganize.

Structurally, What’s Happening?

Psychologically, it’s often:

Collapse of a stabilizing narrative
Ego destabilization
Temporary loss of meaning-making structure
Nervous system dysregulation

The mind feels like it is falling because its previous organizing framework no longer works.

Is It Pathological?

Not necessarily.

It can be:

A precursor to psychological growth
A transition phase toward maturity
A dismantling of false self structures

However, if prolonged or severe, it may indicate:

Major depressive disorder
Panic disorder
Trauma-related disorder
Dissociative instability

Duration, functionality, and level of impairment matter.

Growth vs Breakdown

There’s an important distinction:

Breakdown	Breakthrough
Disintegration without integration	Deconstruction followed by reconstruction
Loss of meaning	Rebuilding meaning
Chronic dysfunction	Temporary destabilization

The difference is whether new structure forms.

From a Depth Psychology Lens

Some might describe this as:

Ego death phase
Descent into the unconscious
Necessary disorientation before individuation

But without containment, it becomes fragmentation rather than transformation.

Stabilizing During Psychological Free Fall

Key interventions:

Nervous system regulation first (sleep, breathing, somatic grounding)
Reduce abstraction (stay concrete, practical)
Limit existential rumination
Strengthen routine and structure
Reality-based thinking over catastrophic interpretation

You don’t build meaning mid-air, you stabilize first.

Shervan K Shahhian

Borderline-Level Defenses, what are they:

Borderline-level defenses are a group of psychological defense mechanisms that are more primitive than neurotic defenses but more organized than psychotic defenses. They are typically associated with borderline personality organization.

These defenses are common in individuals with intense emotional instability, identity diffusion, and unstable relationships, but they can also appear temporarily in highly stressed individuals.

Core Borderline-Level Defenses

1. Splitting

Seeing people (or oneself) as all good or all bad, with no middle ground.

“They are perfect.”
Later: “They are evil.”

This reflects difficulty integrating positive and negative aspects of the same person.

2. Projective Identification

Not just projecting unwanted feelings onto someone else, but subtly behaving in ways that pressure the other person to actually feel or enact what is projected.

Example:

A person unconsciously feels anger.
They accuse the therapist of hostility.
Their behavior becomes provocative.
The therapist starts feeling irritated.

3. Primitive Idealization

Overvaluing someone unrealistically:

“You are the only person who understands me.”
“You are extraordinary.”

Often followed by devaluation when disappointment occurs.

4. Devaluation

The flip side of idealization.

Sudden shift to: “You are useless.”
Intense contempt or dismissal.

5. Denial (Primitive Form)

Refusal to acknowledge emotionally threatening reality, even when evidence is clear.

6. Omnipotence

An exaggerated sense of power or specialness to defend against vulnerability.

“I don’t need anyone.”
“Rules don’t apply to me.”

Structural Context

Borderline-level organization includes:

Identity diffusion (unstable self-concept)
Primitive defenses (like splitting)
Intact reality testing (unlike psychosis)

This differs from:

Neurotic organization: repression, rationalization
Psychotic organization: severe reality distortion

Clinical Insight

Borderline-level defenses often appear in contexts of:

Intense attachment needs
Fear of abandonment
Grandiose or persecutory relational narratives
Rapid shifts in perception of mentors, institutions, or belief systems

Importantly, these defenses are not “bad”, they are protective adaptations formed early in development, often in response to inconsistent or traumatic attachment.

Shervan K Shahhian

Idealism, what is it:

Idealism is a philosophical view that says reality is fundamentally mental, spiritual, or idea-based rather than purely material.

In simple terms:

What is ultimately real is mind or consciousness, not matter.

Core Idea

Materialism says:

Matter=produces mind.

Idealism says the reverse:

Mind=produces or structures what we call matter.

From an idealist perspective, the physical world is either:

Dependent on consciousness
Constructed by consciousness
Or inseparable from consciousness

Major Forms of Idealism

1. Subjective Idealism

“To be is to be perceived.”
Objects exist only insofar as they are perceived.
Reality is made of perceptions in minds.

2. Transcendental Idealism

We never know reality “as it is in itself.”
We only know reality as structured by the human mind.
Space and time are mental frameworks, not independent things.

This doesn’t deny the external world, it says we can only know it through the mind’s organizing structures.

3. Absolute Idealism

Reality is a single, unified spiritual whole.
History and consciousness unfold dialectically.
The universe is the development of Absolute Mind.

4. Modern Idealism

In contemporary philosophy of mind, some argue:

Consciousness is fundamental.
The universe may be mind-like at its base.
Physical reality could emerge from informational or mental processes.

Idealism vs. Realism vs. Materialism

View	What is fundamental?
Materialism	Matter
Dualism	Mind and matter
Idealism	Mind
Realism	Reality exists independent of mind

Psychological Meaning of “Idealism”

In everyday language, idealism also means:

Believing in high ideals
Wanting the world to match moral or spiritual standards
Optimism about human potential

That’s different from philosophical idealism, though historically connected.

Why It Matters

Idealism directly impacts questions like:

What is consciousness?
Does reality exist without observers?
Are mystical experiences glimpses of deeper structure?
Is the universe mental at its foundation?

Shervan K Shahhian

Collective Intelligence beats Solo Intelligence, why:

Because one mind is powerful… but many minds networked together become something qualitatively different.
Here’s why collective intelligence usually outperforms solo intelligence across science, psychology, organizations, and even evolution.

1. Cognitive diversity beats raw IQ

A single brilliant mind still has blind spots. Groups bring:

Different perspectives
Different heuristics and mental models
Different life experiences

This diversity allows the group to:

Catch errors faster
See patterns one person would miss
Generate more creative solutions

Research consistently shows that a diverse group of moderately intelligent people can outperform a homogenous group of high-IQ individuals.

2. Error correction through social feedback

Solo intelligence has no built-in correction system.

Groups provide:

Challenge and contradiction
Reality checks
Peer review

Think science: breakthroughs survive because they’re attacked by other minds. Collective intelligence filters nonsense better than isolation.

3. Parallel processing

One brain works serially.
Many brains work in parallel.

Groups can:

Explore multiple solution paths at once
Divide complex problems into parts
Test ideas simultaneously

This is why ant colonies, human teams, and neural networks scale so well.

4. Emergence: the whole is more than the sum

When individuals interact, new intelligence emerges:

Shared memory
Distributed expertise
Collective pattern recognition

Just like neurons form a mind, people form a meta-mind. No single neuron “understands” a thought yet thought emerges.

5. Motivation and energy amplification

Groups create:

Accountability
Emotional reinforcement
Social momentum

This boosts persistence, learning speed, and problem solving stamina things raw intelligence alone can’t sustain.

6. Evolution selected for it

Humans didn’t dominate because we were the strongest or smartest individually.
We dominated because we could:

Coordinate
Transmit knowledge across generations
Build cumulative culture

Language itself is a collective intelligence technology.

The important caveat

Collective intelligence only beats solo intelligence under the right conditions:

Psychological safety
Open dissent
No dominance by ego or hierarchy

Otherwise, groups devolve into:

Groupthink
Herd stupidity
Echo chambers

A bad collective is worse than a lone thinker.

Bottom line

Solo intelligence is depth.
Collective intelligence is depth plus breadth plus error correction plus emergence.

Shervan K Shahhian

Identity-Threat Distortions, explained:

Identity-threat distortions are predictable ways perception and thinking warp when something feels like it endangers who you are (values, role, belonging, competence, morality). The nervous system flips into protect-the-self mode, and accuracy takes a back seat.

Here are the big ones, clean and clinical, but you’ll probably recognize them instantly:

Core identity-threat distortions

1. All-or-nothing identity collapse “If this is true, everything about me is wrong. ”A single challenge becomes a total self-invalidation.

2. Moralization distortion Disagreement = “bad,” “dangerous,” or “evil.”This often shows up when values or belief systems are the threatened identity anchor.

3. Personalization of neutral data Information isn’t about an issue, it’s about me. Curiosity from others feels like an attack.

4. Status-threat amplification Small cues are interpreted as humiliation, rejection, or loss of rank. Especially common when identity is tied to expertise, authority, or intelligence.

5. Temporal foreclosure “This will never recover. ”The future collapses into a single catastrophic outcome.

6. Loyalty distortion “To question this means betrayal. ”Common in groups where belonging = safety.

7. Intentionality projection Others are assumed to be acting with hostile or manipulative intent, even without evidence.

8. Self-protective rigidity Beliefs harden, not because they’re accurate, but because they’re load-bearing for identity stability.

What’s actually happening underneath

This isn’t “cognitive error” in the casual sense—it’s threat physiology:

(Consult a Neurologist)

Amygdala up, prefrontal cortex down
Belonging + survival circuits dominate
Meaning gets compressed and polarized

Accuracy returns only when the identity feels safe again.

Fast ways to unwind identity-threat distortions

Name the threatened identity explicitly(“This feels like a threat to my competence / goodness / belonging.”)
Differentiate self from position(“I can revise a belief without erasing myself.”)
Restore temporal depth(“What would this look like in 6 months if I adapt rather than defend?”)
Regulate first, reason second Logic doesn’t land until the body exits threat mode.

Clinical tell (useful in therapy)

If reasoning becomes:

Urgent
Absolute
Morally loaded
Defensive of belonging

You’re not in belief, updating mode, you’re in identity-protection mode.

Shervan K Shahhian

Understanding Religious or Ideological Absolutism:

Religious absolutism and ideological absolutism are close cousins—different costumes, same nervous system. The core issue in both is certainty fused with identity.

Here’s a clean way to distinguish and connect them:

Religious Absolutism

Definition:
The belief that one sacred doctrine (God, scripture, revelation, prophet) holds total and final truth, beyond question or revision.

Psychological markers:

Truth is revealed, not discovered
Doubt = moral failure or spiritual danger
Authority is external (God, scripture, clergy)
Identity = “I am right because God says so”

Function:
Provides existential safety, moral clarity, and group cohesion—especially under threat.

Shadow side:

Suppression of inquiry
Moralization of disagreement
Justification of harm “for a higher good”

Ideological Absolutism

Definition:
The belief that one explanatory framework (political, scientific, moral, social) fully accounts for reality and must be universally applied.

Psychological markers:

Truth is derived, but treated as unquestionable
Dissent = ignorance, pathology, or evil
Authority is abstract (Reason, Science, History, Progress)
Identity = “I am right because reality demands it”

Function:
Offers predictability, control, and moral certainty in complex systems.

Shadow side:

Reduction of humans to categories
Dehumanization of dissenters
Dogmatism disguised as rationality

The Shared Core (This is the key)

Both are expressions of epistemic closure under threat.

When:

uncertainty is intolerable
identity is fused to belief
social belonging depends on agreement

…absolutism emerges.

It is less about what is believed and more about how the belief is held.

A Simple Litmus Test

Ask one question:

“What would count as evidence that I might be wrong?”

If the answer is “nothing” → absolutism
If the answer is “only my side can define that” → absolutism
If the answer is specific, revisable, and dialogical → not absolutism

Developmental Lens (important)

Absolutism often corresponds to:

Early-stage meaning systems
Trauma-based threat regulation
High shame or fear of chaos

It’s not stupidity or evil—it’s a safety strategy.

Healthy Alternative (in one line)

Conviction without closure.
Strong values, open epistemology.

Shervan K Shahhian

Hypnagogia vs Dissociative Imagery vs Intuition, explained:

Here’s a clean differential framework that separates hypnagogia, dissociative imagery, and intuition across state of consciousness, control, phenomenology, and clinical/psi relevance.

1. Hypnagogic Imagery

(Sleep–wake threshold phenomena)

State

Transitional: waking → sleep (theta-dominant)
Reduced executive control
Time distortion common

Phenomenology

Vivid images, faces, scenes, symbols
Often cinematic or fragmentary
Can include voices, geometric patterns, flashes
Emotionally neutral or mildly uncanny

Agency

Passive reception
Images arise without intention
Attempts to control often collapse the imagery

Temporal Quality

Ephemeral, unstable
Shifts rapidly unless sleep deepens

Meaning Structure

Associative, symbolic, non-linear
Not reliably accurate or actionable without later interpretation

Clinical / Psi Notes

Normal, universal phenomenon
Can serve as a raw signal source in creative or psi contexts
High noise-to-signal ratio

Key Marker

“It’s happening to me as I’m drifting.”

2. Dissociative Imagery

(Protective or fragment-based internal imagery)

State

Altered waking consciousness
Often linked to trauma, attachment injury, or defensive withdrawal
Can occur fully awake

Phenomenology

Repetitive scenes, archetypal figures, inner landscapes
Strong affect (fear, longing, shame, threat)
May feel immersive or “other than me”

Agency

Semi-autonomous
Imagery may feel intrusive or compelling
Often resistant to voluntary modification

Temporal Quality

Persistent, looping, sticky
Trigger-linked

Meaning Structure

Self-referential
Encodes memory, affect, survival strategy
Often symbolic of unmet needs or threats

Clinical / Psi Notes

Commonly misidentified as intuition or psychic input
Accuracy is internally coherent, not externally predictive
Responds to grounding, IFS, titration

Key Marker

“This image feels emotionally charged and won’t let go.”

3. Intuition

(Non-imagistic knowing / perception)

State

Fully awake, regulated nervous system
Clear executive function
Often arises in calm or focused states

Phenomenology

Minimal imagery or none
Felt sense, certainty, “just knowing”
Somatic markers (gut, chest, orientation shifts)

Agency

Neither forced nor intrusive
Appears spontaneously, then recedes
Does not demand attention

Temporal Quality

Brief, clean, stable
Leaves a residue of clarity

Meaning Structure

Non-symbolic
Direct, contextual, often actionable
Low emotional charge

Clinical / Psi Notes

Easily obscured by imagery
Strengthens with nervous system regulation
Compatible with both psychological and psi frameworks

Key Marker

“There’s no picture — just clarity.”

Side-by-Side Snapshot

Feature Hypnagogia Dissociative Imagery Intuition Consciousness Sleep threshold Altered waking Fully awake Imagery Vivid, unstable Repetitive, charged Minimal or none Emotional Load Low–moderate High Low Control Passive Semi-autonomous Neutral Reference Point Associative Self/trauma-linked Contextual/external Reliability Low Internally coherent High

Common Confusions (Very Important)

Hypnagogia ≠ intuition
Hypnagogia produces content; intuition produces knowing.
Dissociative imagery ≠ psi perception
Trauma imagery can feel “other” but is still self-referential.
More imagery ≠ more accuracy
In both CRV and clinical intuition, less imagery often means cleaner signal.

Practical Discernment Questions

Ask in the moment:

Am I drifting or fully awake?
→ drifting = hypnagogia

Is this emotionally charged or looping?
→ charged = dissociative imagery

Is there an image, or just certainty?
→ certainty = intuition

Does it demand attention, or quietly inform?
→ demands = imagery
→ informs = intuition

Shervan K Shahhian

Non-Ordinary Perception, What is it:

Non-ordinary perception refers to ways of perceiving that fall outside everyday, consensus sensory experience — yet are recognized across psychology, neuroscience, anthropology, and consciousness studies.

What “Non-Ordinary Perception” Means

It describes perceptual experiences that arise when the nervous system operates outside its default predictive mode.

These experiences may involve:

Altered sensory integration

Expanded internal imagery

Reduced filtering of subtle signals

Changes in time, space, or self-boundaries

They are state-dependent, not inherently pathological.

Common Forms

1. Imaginal / Symbolic Perception

Vivid inner imagery

Archetypal or symbolic content

Hypnagogic or hypnopompic visions

Active imagination states (Jung)

➡ Often mediated by right-hemisphere and default mode network shifts

2. Somatic-Perceptual Knowing

“Knowing” through the body

Sensations preceding conscious thought

Felt sense, vibrations, pressure, or movement

➡ Linked to interoception and subcortical processing

3. Intuitive or Non-Linear Cognition

Sudden insights without step-by-step reasoning

Pattern recognition beyond conscious awareness

Time-independent knowing

➡ Seen in expert intuition, trauma adaptations, and contemplative states

4. Altered Sensory Thresholds

Heightened sound, light, or energy sensitivity

Synesthetic overlap

Blurred internal/external boundaries

➡ Often emerges during stress, meditation, psychedelics, or liminal states

5. Transpersonal or Anomalous Perception

Perception beyond the individual self

Experiences of guidance, presence, or contact

Remote or nonlocal impressions

➡ Studied in parapsychology, CRV, and transpersonal psychology

Clinical Distinction (Important)

Non-ordinary perception is not psychosis when:

✔ Insight is preserved

✔ Meaning is flexible, not rigid

✔ Functioning is intact

✔ Experience is state-dependent

✔ There is no compulsory belief enforcement

Pathology begins when threat-based interpretations dominate perception.

Trauma & Survival Context

From a trauma lens:

Non-ordinary perception can be a survival intelligence

The system learns to detect subtle cues when overt cues were unsafe

Heightened pattern detection ≠ delusion

This aligns with protective dissociation and adaptive hypervigilance.

CRV & Structured Access

In Controlled Remote Viewing:

Non-ordinary perception is trained, bracketed, and disciplined

Emphasis is on signal vs. analytic overlay

The nervous system learns regulated access rather than flooding

This is a key distinction between skillful access and destabilization.

Integrative View

Non-ordinary perception is best understood as:

A spectrum of human perceptual capacity, shaped by state, training, trauma, and culture — requiring regulation, context, and meaning-making.

Shervan K Shahhian

Understanding Risk Intelligence:

Risk intelligence is the ability to accurately identify, interpret, and respond to risks — not just by gathering data, but by making sound judgments under uncertainty. It blends psychology, critical thinking, and strategic awareness.

Here’s a clear, practical breakdown:

What Risk Intelligence Actually Means

Risk intelligence is your capacity to answer two questions accurately:

What is going on?
(Perception: noticing signals, patterns, early warnings)

What should I do about it?
(Decision-making: choosing actions under uncertainty)

High risk intelligence means your judgments about danger, opportunity, and probability are calibrated to reality.

Core Components of Risk Intelligence

1. Threat Perception (Detection)

Recognizing early cues of danger or change:

Behavioral anomalies
Emotional/physiological signals
Environmental shifts
Pattern recognition

People with high RI detect weak signals before they become crises.

2. Cognitive Calibration (Thinking Clearly)

This is the psychological skill of aligning your beliefs with actual probabilities:

You don’t overreact
You don’t underreact
You adjust as new information comes in

Calibration is what separates intuition from wishful thinking.

3. Emotional Regulation (Staying Grounded)

Fear, anger, or desire can distort risk perception.
High RI requires:

Staying calm under stress
Not letting hope or fear hijack judgment
Using emotions as data, not commands

4. Scenario Thinking (Strategic Foresight)

Generating realistic “what if” paths:

Best-case / worst-case
Most likely scenario
Red-team thinking (how could this go wrong?)

This builds psychological resilience and reduces surprise.

5. Decision Architecture (Taking the Right Action)

Risk intelligence is useless unless you can act:

Choosing options with the best risk-reward balance
Creating buffers and contingencies
Avoiding escalation traps
Knowing when not to act

6. Sensemaking (Integrating Multiple Signals)

You combine:

Data
Intuition
Experience
Environmental feedback

Sensemaking turns noise into insight.

Why Risk Intelligence Matters

High RI increases:

Personal safety
Strategic judgment
Emotional stability
Performance in crises
Leadership effectiveness
Ability to navigate uncertainty and complex systems

This is why military strategists, intelligence analysts, psychologists, and high-level decision makers train it deliberately.

A Simple 5-Step Framework to Build Risk Intelligence

Here’s a practical self-training method:

Notice
Write down early signals you observe each day (behavioral, emotional, environmental).

Interpret
Ask: What might this mean? What else could it mean?

Estimate
Assign a rough probability to each interpretation (10%, 50%, 80%).

Act
Choose the lowest-regret action.

Review
After the fact, check how accurate your estimate was.
This step is what improves calibration.

Shervan K Shahhian

Understanding Intuitive Data Interpretation:

Intuitive data interpretation refers to using non-analytical, pattern-recognizing, often subconscious capacities to make sense of information. It’s not about guessing, it’s about using rapid, experience-driven pattern detection that your mind performs beneath conscious awareness. Psychologist and some who are deeply involved in CRV, altered states, and symbolic analysis, might recognize that intuitive interpretation blends cognitive, perceptual, and sometimes archetypal processes.

Here’s a clear breakdown:

1. What Is Intuitive Data Interpretation?

It is the ability to extract meaning from complex or ambiguous information without relying exclusively on linear, step-by-step reasoning. Instead, the brain uses:

Implicit memory
Heuristics
Pattern recognition
Emotional resonance (affect-as-information)
Somatic markers
Symbolic/archetypal associations

Essentially, intuition is fast, automatic, and associative, compared to analytical reasoning, which is slow and deliberate.

2. Where It Comes From (Psychological Mechanisms)

a. The “Thin Slice” Effect

Your brain can evaluate large amounts of data instantly from small cues.
Example: clinicians intuitively sensing the direction a case is going from tone, posture, or micro-patterns.

b. The Somatic Marker Hypothesis

Your body gives a “felt sense” that guides choices before you consciously understand why.
This is the bodily version of pattern recognition.

c. Implicit Knowledge Integration

Years of experience accumulate into unconscious rules. Psychologists, remote viewers, analysts, and investigators often draw on this.

3. Types of Data Where Intuition Helps

Ambiguous or incomplete data
Human behavior, motives, or emotional states
Symbolic, archetypal, or mythic material
Geopolitical or strategic scenarios (analysts often use intuitive “sensemaking”)
CRV Stage 1–3 signals (immediate impressions before AOL kicks in)

4. In CRV and Altered States

You can see intuitive interpretation as the “natural mode” of low-beta, alpha, and theta states, where the mind is:

less filtering
more open to subtle impressions
more integrative
less constrained by linear logic

This is why remote viewers and sensitives often receive “data bursts” that feel like impressions rather than thoughts.

5. Psychological Applications

a. Clinical Settings

Intuitive interpretation helps with:

case formulation
tracking emotional undercurrents
identifying unspoken client themes
predicting relational patterns

b. Threat Assessment / Strategic Psychology

Intuition identifies:

anomalies
dishonesty
escalation signals
hidden motives
inconsistencies

c. Symbolic/Archetypal Work

Intuitive interpretation is essential for:

dreams
metaphors
mythic narratives
personal symbolism
synchronicities

6. How to Strengthen It (Professional Methods)

1. Quiet Cognitive Noise

Meditation, breathwork, pre-session centering.

2. Suspension of Premature Interpretation

Hold data lightly before concluding.

3. Somatic Tracking

Notice micro-shifts in chest, gut, or hands.

4. Pattern Journaling

Record impressions → check them against outcomes.

5. Dual-Process Awareness Training

Move deliberately between “slow brain” and “fast brain.”

6. Using CRV Protocols

CRV teaches disciplined intuition:
data → sketch → descriptor → analysis (later stage).

7. How to Know When It’s Accurate

Indicators that intuition is functioning (not bias):

Neutral emotional tone
Comes quickly and quietly
No need to justify it
Symbolic rather than narrative
Somatic clarity rather than tension
Repeats itself subtly

Shervan K Shahhian