spirituality – Page 2 – LIBERTY PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Veridical Information, explained:

Veridical information refers to information that is demonstrably accurate and corresponds to real events or facts, especially when the person receiving it should not normally have access to it.

The term is widely used in parapsychology, psychology, and philosophy of mind when evaluating anomalous experiences.

1. Basic Definition

Veridical simply means truthful or corresponding to reality.

So veridical information is:

Information obtained during an experience that can later be objectively verified as correct.

2. Example in Parapsychology

In parapsychology, veridical information often appears in experiences like:

Near-death experiences (NDEs)
After-death communications (ADCs)
Mediumship
Remote viewing
Apparitions

Example:

A person reports seeing a deceased relative during a dream or vision, and the relative communicates:

a specific message
a hidden object
or an unknown family fact

Later, family members confirm the information is accurate but previously unknown to the experiencer.

If verified, researchers call this veridical information.

3. Example in Near-Death Research

In some reported NDEs, patients describe:

conversations in the operating room
objects placed in high locations
events happening outside the room

If hospital staff confirm these details, researchers call it veridical perception during NDE.

4. Importance in Parapsychology

Veridical information is important because it helps researchers distinguish between:

Experience Type	Explanation
Psychological hallucination	internally generated
Memory reconstruction	created after the fact
Super-psi hypothesis	psi functioning of the living mind
Survival of consciousness hypothesis	information from deceased consciousness

Veridical information is considered key evidence in debates about the survival of consciousness after death.

5. In Bereavement Experiences

In grief-related anomalous experiences, a person might receive veridical information such as:

location of lost objects
unknown family information
messages verified later

Researchers studying bereavement-related anomalous experiences sometimes treat such cases as potential evidence for anomalous information transfer.

6. Scientific Caution

Scientists remain cautious because veridical information could also arise from:

coincidence
subconscious inference
Cold Reading
Cryptomnesia
Confirmation Bias

So careful documentation and independent verification are essential.

In simple terms:

Veridical information: accurate information obtained through an unusual experience that later proves to be objectively true.

Shervan K Shahhian

Bereavement Visions in Parapsychology Research, explained:

Bereavement visions are one of the studied forms of after-death related anomalous experiences in parapsychology. Researchers examine them as possible perceptual experiences of the deceased occurring after death, usually reported by grieving individuals.

1. What Bereavement Visions Are

In parapsychology, bereavement visions are experiences in which a grieving person perceives the deceased as present. These perceptions can include:

Visual apparitions (seeing the deceased person)
Auditory experiences (hearing their voice)
Tactile sensations (feeling a touch or embrace)
Sense of presence
Dream encounters with vivid realism

These are often grouped under After‑Death Communications (ADCs).

Typical characteristics reported in research:

Occur spontaneously
Usually happen within the first year after death
Are often comforting rather than frightening
Individuals usually remain psychologically stable

2. Classic Parapsychology Research

One of the earliest major investigations came from the Society for Psychical Research (SPR).

Findings:

Thousands of reports of apparitions and crisis experiences were collected.
Some reports occurred close to the time of death of the person seen.
Researchers proposed the possibility of telepathic hallucinations.

3. Modern Bereavement Vision Research

Modern parapsychology approaches the phenomenon more systematically.

Many have Researched

Some of the research has documented thousands of cases.

Findings:

ADCs occur across cultures and religions
Most experiencers report psychological comfort
Many experiences involve clear sensory perception

4. Bereavement Vision Research in Psychology

Psychological researchers also studied these experiences without assuming a paranormal explanation.

A study was conducted that:

Some studied widows and widowers and found:

Some reported sensing or seeing the deceased spouse
Most participants did not consider themselves mentally ill

This suggested bereavement visions are relatively common in normal grief.

5. How Parapsychology Interprets Bereavement Visions

Parapsychologists generally consider four explanatory models.

1. Survival Model

The experience is interpreted as actual communication from the deceased.

2. Psi or Super-Psi Model

Related to the Super-Psi Theory:

The living person unconsciously gathers information via telepathy or clairvoyance
The mind constructs the experience.

3. Psychological Model

The experience arises from grief-related cognitive and emotional processes.

4. Hybrid Model

Some researchers think multiple mechanisms may operate simultaneously.

6. Typical Characteristics of Bereavement Visions

Parapsychological case collections consistently report:

Occur during quiet states or transitions (sleep/waking)
The apparition often appears healthy and peaceful
Messages are usually brief and reassuring
The experience ends abruptly

These features differentiate them from clinical hallucinations associated with psychiatric disorders.

7. Why Bereavement Visions Interest Parapsychologists

They are important because they potentially relate to the survival of consciousness hypothesis.

Researchers view them as valuable because they:

occur spontaneously
often involve ordinary individuals
can sometimes contain veridical information

In summary:
Bereavement visions are reported experiences in which the bereaved perceive the deceased. Parapsychology studies them as possible after-death communications, psi phenomena, or grief-related experiences, while psychology often interprets them as normal features of the grieving process.

Shervan K Shahhian

Religious Hallucinations, explained:

Religious hallucinations could be sensory experiences involving religious or spiritual content that occur without an external stimulus. The person could believe they are hearing, seeing, or feeling a divine or supernatural presence.

CONSULT WITH A PSYCHIATRIST

These experiences might occur in psychiatric disorders, extreme stress, bereavement, or sometimes in intense religious states. Because you study psychology and parapsychology, this topic is interesting since the two fields often interpret them very differently.

1. What Religious Hallucinations Look Like

They might involve religious figures, voices, or supernatural entities.

Common examples could include:

Auditory

Hearing the voice of God
Hearing angels or demons speaking
Commands believed to come from a divine source

Visual

Seeing Jesus, angels, saints, or demons
Visions of heaven, hell, or divine light

Tactile / Somatic

Feeling touched by a spiritual being
Sensation of possession or spiritual energy entering the body

Olfactory

Smelling incense, sulfur, or sacred fragrances without a source

2. Conditions Where They Commonly Occur

In clinical psychology, religious hallucinations might appear in several disorders:

Psychotic Disorders

Might commonly appear in

Schizophrenia
Schizoaffective Disorder

Some Typical features:

Commanding voices
Religious delusions (e.g., believing one is a prophet or chosen by God)

Mood Disorders with Psychosis

Such as:

Bipolar Disorder (during manic episodes)
Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features

Example:

Hearing God condemning or judging them.

Neurological Conditions

CONSULT WITH A NEOUROLOGIST

Temporal-lobe disturbances are especially associated with intense mystical or religious visions.

3. Cultural and Religious Context

Some psychologists might emphasize that culture strongly shapes hallucination content.

For example:

Christians may see Jesus or angels
Hindus may see deities

The brain might often use the person’s belief system to interpret unusual sensory experiences.

4. Difference Between Religious Experience and Hallucination

Some Psychologists might usually distinguish them by several criteria.

Healthy Religious Experience	Religious Hallucination
Occurs during prayer or meditation	Occurs spontaneously
Person retains critical thinking	Person believes it absolutely
Not distressing or commanding	Often commanding or frightening
Does not impair functioning	Often disrupts life

5. Parapsychological Interpretations

In parapsychology, some researchers might argue that not all such experiences are pathological.

Two interpretations sometimes maybe discussed:

Psi-mediated perception: (telepathy/clairvoyance)
Super-Psi / Living Agent Psi model: unconscious psychic abilities producing the experience.

This perspective could be discussed by researchers at the
Society for Psychical Research and the
Parapsychological Association.

However, mainstream science still treats most of these cases as psychological or neurological phenomena.

In summary:
Religious hallucinations are sensory experiences with spiritual content that occur without an external source. Clinically they are often linked to psychosis, neurological disorders, or extreme emotional states, while parapsychology sometimes explores non-ordinary interpretations.

Shervan K Shahhian

Bereavement-Related Anomalous Experiences, what are they:

Bereavement-Related Anomalous Experiences (BRAEs) could be unusual perceptual or psychological experiences reported by people after the death of a loved one. They could be widely discussed in both clinical bereavement research and Parapsychology. These experiences might often feel very real and meaningful to the bereaved person.

What They Are

Bereavement-related anomalous experiences could be subjective experiences in which a grieving person perceives contact, presence, or communication from the deceased.

They typically occur during the early stages of grief but may also appear years later.

Some researchers in grief psychology might sometimes call them After-Death Communications (ADCs).

Common Types of Bereavement Experiences

1. Sense of Presence

A person feels the deceased nearby even though no one is physically there.

Examples:

Feeling the loved one sitting beside them
Sensing someone in the room
Feeling watched over

2. Visual Experiences

Seeing the deceased briefly or in dreams.

Examples:

Seeing the loved one standing in the room
A vivid waking vision
Extremely realistic dreams of the deceased

These are sometimes called grief visions.

3. Auditory Experiences

Hearing the voice of the deceased.

Examples:

Hearing their name called
Hearing them speak a brief message

4. Tactile Experiences

Physical sensations associated with the deceased.

Examples:

Feeling a touch on the shoulder
Feeling someone sit on the bed

5. Symbolic Coincidences

Events interpreted as meaningful signs.

Examples:

Unusual animal appearances
Objects moving or appearing unexpectedly
Music associated with the deceased playing suddenly

6. Dream Encounters

Dreams where the deceased appears alive, healthy, and communicating.

Some people might report these dreams as emotionally healing rather than disturbing.

How Common Are They?

Surprisingly, they could be very common.

Studies in bereavement research might suggest:

Some of widows and widowers report at least one experience
Many people might never report them because they fear being judged

Possible Psychological Interpretation

Possibly in clinical psychology, these experiences could often explained as:

Normal grief phenomena
Memory activation and emotional processing
Attachment system responses
Temporary sensory misperceptions during intense mourning

Importantly, they may not usually be considered symptoms of mental illness unless they are persistent, distressing, or impair functioning.

Possible Interpretation in Parapsychology

Some researchers in Parapsychology might sometimes explore other possibilities:

Survival hypothesis: consciousness continues after death
Super-Psi Hypothesis: the bereaved mind unconsciously produces psi information
Psychological coping mechanisms

Some parapsychologists acknowledge that multiple explanations may coexist.

Possible, Key Characteristics

Bereavement anomalous experiences might have these traits:

Brief and spontaneous
Occur during emotional vulnerability
Feel comforting rather than frightening
Do not typically impair reality testing

Example Report

A typical report might be:

“After my husband died, I woke up one night and felt him sit on the bed and place his hand on my shoulder. I wasn’t scared, it felt comforting.”

Experiences like this might be reported cross-culturally and throughout history.

Possibly Important Clinical Perspective

Some modern grief specialists might view these experiences as:

Common
Usually healthy
Often helpful in the grieving process

Unless they become persistent hallucinations with loss of insight, they are not treated as psychiatric disorders.

Shervan K Shahhian

The Fourth Model Many Modern Parapsychologists Discuss the “Super-Psi or Living Agent Psi model”:

Many modern researchers in Parapsychology may discuss a fourth explanatory model for anomalous experiences that could be called the “Super-Psi” or “Living Agent Psi (LAP)” model. This model tries to explain phenomena that appear paranormal or spirit-related without requiring discarnate spirits or external entities.

The Super-Psi / Living Agent Psi Model

Basic idea:
All the information or effects involved in an anomalous experience come from the psychic abilities of living people, usually unconsciously.

These abilities may include:

Telepathy: mind-to-mind information transfer
Clairvoyance: acquiring information about distant or hidden events
Precognition: knowledge of future events
Psychokinesis: mental influence on physical systems

The “super” part of the theory means these abilities operate at extremely complex and powerful levels, combining all of the above simultaneously.

Why It Was Proposed

Some researchers may have noticed that some paranormal cases seemed to involve:

Accurate information about deceased people
Objects moving or disturbances (poltergeist cases)
Visions or voices that seem external
Mediumistic information

Instead of assuming spirits, the Super-Psi model suggests:

The living person’s unconscious psi gathers information from anywhere in space and time and constructs the experience.

Example

A grief apparition:
Someone sees and hears a deceased relative.

Interpretations by different models:

Psychological model: grief hallucination
Survival model: the spirit of the deceased actually appeared
Psi model: telepathic/clairvoyant perception
Super-Psi model: the experiencer’s unconscious psi accessed information about the deceased and created the full perception

Where It Is Used

The model is often discussed in research areas such as:

Apparitions
Mediumship
Poltergeist cases
Near-death and after-death communication reports

Some influential parapsychologists who possibly debated these ideas include:

J. B. Rhine
Ian Stevenson
Stephen E. Braude

Strengths of the Model

Parapsychologists might consider it attractive because it:

Explains paranormal information without requiring spirits
Uses known psi processes studied in labs
Can theoretically explain very complex cases

Main Criticism

Critics may argue the model becomes too powerful and unfalsifiable.

For example:

If unconscious psi can access any mind, any place, any time, then almost any paranormal event might be explained by Super-Psi, making it difficult to test scientifically.

Important Debate in Parapsychology

Today the biggest debate in Parapsychology could be between:

Super-Psi / Living Agent Psi theory
Survival of consciousness after death

Both might attempt to explain the same phenomena but propose very different realities.

Shervan K Shahhian

Intense Inner Criticism Might Block Intuitive Perception or Creative Cognition, why:

Intense inner criticism might block intuitive perception and creative cognition because it activates psychological processes that might interfere with the mental states required for intuition and creativity. Several mechanisms could be involved:

1. Threat Activation in the Brain

When the inner critic becomes harsh, the brain might interpret it as a threat.

Certain parts of the brain, might activate a stress response.
Stress hormones might (like cortisol) increase.
The mind might shift into defensive or survival mode.

This state might suppress the open, associative thinking needed for creativity and intuition.

2. Overactivation of the Analytical Mind

Intuition might to emerge from quiet, non-linear processing.

However, intense self-criticism might force excessive activity in the mind, particularly areas involved in:

self-monitoring
error detection
judgment

This produces hyper-analytical thinking, which might crowd out subtle intuitive signals.

3. Cognitive Load and Mental Noise

Harsh self-evaluation might create constant mental commentary:

“That idea is stupid.”
“You’re wrong.”
“You shouldn’t think that.”

This internal noise might interfere with spontaneous insights that arise from the Default Mode Network, a brain network that could be associated with imagination, internal reflection, and creative incubation.

4. Suppression of Psychological Safety

Creativity might require permission to explore imperfect ideas.

An intense inner critic:

punishes mistakes
discourages risk-taking
blocks experimentation

Without psychological safety, the mind might stop generating novel associations.

5. Reduced Access to Implicit Processing

Intuition could relay on implicit processing information that the brain has learned but cannot easily verbalize.

Harsh internal judgment disrupts this because it demands immediate logical proof, preventing intuitive impressions from surfacing.

6. Interruption of “Flow States”

Flow requires:

relaxed concentration
reduced self-consciousness
minimal self-judgment

The inner critic might do the opposite, it might increase self-conscious monitoring, which might break the flow state.

Psychological Summary

Intense inner criticism produces:

fear of error
hyper-analysis
cognitive overload
suppression of exploratory thinking

All of these block the mental conditions could be required for intuition and creativity.

A Useful Psychological Paradox

Many creative and intuitive breakthroughs occur after the mind relaxes—during:

meditation
daydreaming
walking
sleep transitions

These states quiet the inner critic, allowing deeper cognitive processes to emerge.

Shervan K Shahhian

Spiritual & Existential Exploration, explained:

Spiritual & Existential Exploration refers to the process of deeply examining questions about meaning, purpose, identity, consciousness, and the nature of existence. It involves reflecting on both spiritual realities (transcendent or metaphysical dimensions) and existential questions (the human condition and our place in the universe).

1. Existential Exploration (Philosophical Dimension)

This focuses on fundamental questions such as:

Why do we exist?
What is the meaning of life?
What is consciousness?
What happens after death?
Do humans have free will or destiny?

2. Spiritual Exploration (Transcendent Dimension)

Spiritual exploration deals with experiences or beliefs related to:

The soul or higher self
Higher intelligence or cosmic consciousness
Mystical experiences
Life after death
Non-ordinary states of consciousness

This is often studied in fields like:

Transpersonal Psychology
Parapsychology

Practices often include:

Meditation
Mysticism
Near-death experience research
Consciousness exploration
Psi phenomena studies (remote viewing, telepathy, etc.)

3. Psychological Perspective

From a clinical or psychological viewpoint, spiritual existential exploration can involve:

Identity development
Meaning-making
Coping with mortality
Integration of mystical or anomalous experiences

It is closely related to:

Existential therapy
Logotherapy
Spiritual integration in psychotherapy

4. Common Triggers for Spiritual & Existential Exploration

People often begin this journey after:

Near-death experiences
Loss or trauma
Mystical or anomalous experiences
Deep meditation or psychedelic experiences
Scientific or philosophical curiosity about consciousness

5. Core Themes Explored

Typical themes include:

Nature of reality
Consciousness beyond the brain
Human purpose
Connection with universal intelligence
Evolution of consciousness

In advanced exploration, some individuals begin examining possibilities like:

non-local consciousness
survival of consciousness after death
contact with non-human intelligence
expanded perception abilities

These topics often appear in parapsychology and consciousness research.

In simple terms:
Spiritual & Existential Exploration is the search to understand who we really are, why we exist, and what the deeper structure of reality might be.

Shervan K Shahhian

Psychological Free Fall, what is it:

Psychological free fall is not a formal diagnostic term, but it’s often used metaphorically to describe a sudden and destabilizing loss of psychological structure, meaning, or emotional stability.

It refers to the subjective experience of:

Losing your sense of identity
Losing your belief system or worldview
Emotional overwhelm without grounding
A collapse of certainty or control
Feeling like you are “falling” internally with nothing to hold onto

What It Feels Like

People describe it as:

“The ground disappeared under me.”
“Everything I believed is unraveling.”
“I don’t know who I am anymore.”
Intense anxiety or existential dread
Derealization or depersonalization
Sudden collapse of confidence

It can feel similar to:

An identity crisis
An existential crisis
Acute stress reaction
A depressive or anxiety episode

Common Triggers

Psychological free fall can be triggered by:

Divorce, betrayal, or relationship loss
Loss of career or status
Spiritual deconstruction
Trauma exposure
Public humiliation
Collapse of grandiosity or narcissistic defenses
Deep shadow confrontation (especially in intense self-exploration work)

This state often appears when illusions dissolve faster than the psyche can reorganize.

Structurally, What’s Happening?

Psychologically, it’s often:

Collapse of a stabilizing narrative
Ego destabilization
Temporary loss of meaning-making structure
Nervous system dysregulation

The mind feels like it is falling because its previous organizing framework no longer works.

Is It Pathological?

Not necessarily.

It can be:

A precursor to psychological growth
A transition phase toward maturity
A dismantling of false self structures

However, if prolonged or severe, it may indicate:

Major depressive disorder
Panic disorder
Trauma-related disorder
Dissociative instability

Duration, functionality, and level of impairment matter.

Growth vs Breakdown

There’s an important distinction:

Breakdown	Breakthrough
Disintegration without integration	Deconstruction followed by reconstruction
Loss of meaning	Rebuilding meaning
Chronic dysfunction	Temporary destabilization

The difference is whether new structure forms.

From a Depth Psychology Lens

Some might describe this as:

Ego death phase
Descent into the unconscious
Necessary disorientation before individuation

But without containment, it becomes fragmentation rather than transformation.

Stabilizing During Psychological Free Fall

Key interventions:

Nervous system regulation first (sleep, breathing, somatic grounding)
Reduce abstraction (stay concrete, practical)
Limit existential rumination
Strengthen routine and structure
Reality-based thinking over catastrophic interpretation

You don’t build meaning mid-air, you stabilize first.

Shervan K Shahhian

Idealism, what is it:

Idealism is a philosophical view that says reality is fundamentally mental, spiritual, or idea-based rather than purely material.

In simple terms:

What is ultimately real is mind or consciousness, not matter.

Core Idea

Materialism says:

Matter=produces mind.

Idealism says the reverse:

Mind=produces or structures what we call matter.

From an idealist perspective, the physical world is either:

Dependent on consciousness
Constructed by consciousness
Or inseparable from consciousness

Major Forms of Idealism

1. Subjective Idealism

“To be is to be perceived.”
Objects exist only insofar as they are perceived.
Reality is made of perceptions in minds.

2. Transcendental Idealism

We never know reality “as it is in itself.”
We only know reality as structured by the human mind.
Space and time are mental frameworks, not independent things.

This doesn’t deny the external world, it says we can only know it through the mind’s organizing structures.

3. Absolute Idealism

Reality is a single, unified spiritual whole.
History and consciousness unfold dialectically.
The universe is the development of Absolute Mind.

4. Modern Idealism

In contemporary philosophy of mind, some argue:

Consciousness is fundamental.
The universe may be mind-like at its base.
Physical reality could emerge from informational or mental processes.

Idealism vs. Realism vs. Materialism

View	What is fundamental?
Materialism	Matter
Dualism	Mind and matter
Idealism	Mind
Realism	Reality exists independent of mind

Psychological Meaning of “Idealism”

In everyday language, idealism also means:

Believing in high ideals
Wanting the world to match moral or spiritual standards
Optimism about human potential

That’s different from philosophical idealism, though historically connected.

Why It Matters

Idealism directly impacts questions like:

What is consciousness?
Does reality exist without observers?
Are mystical experiences glimpses of deeper structure?
Is the universe mental at its foundation?

Shervan K Shahhian

Identity-Threat Distortions, explained:

Identity-threat distortions are predictable ways perception and thinking warp when something feels like it endangers who you are (values, role, belonging, competence, morality). The nervous system flips into protect-the-self mode, and accuracy takes a back seat.

Here are the big ones, clean and clinical, but you’ll probably recognize them instantly:

Core identity-threat distortions

1. All-or-nothing identity collapse “If this is true, everything about me is wrong. ”A single challenge becomes a total self-invalidation.

2. Moralization distortion Disagreement = “bad,” “dangerous,” or “evil.”This often shows up when values or belief systems are the threatened identity anchor.

3. Personalization of neutral data Information isn’t about an issue, it’s about me. Curiosity from others feels like an attack.

4. Status-threat amplification Small cues are interpreted as humiliation, rejection, or loss of rank. Especially common when identity is tied to expertise, authority, or intelligence.

5. Temporal foreclosure “This will never recover. ”The future collapses into a single catastrophic outcome.

6. Loyalty distortion “To question this means betrayal. ”Common in groups where belonging = safety.

7. Intentionality projection Others are assumed to be acting with hostile or manipulative intent, even without evidence.

8. Self-protective rigidity Beliefs harden, not because they’re accurate, but because they’re load-bearing for identity stability.

What’s actually happening underneath

This isn’t “cognitive error” in the casual sense—it’s threat physiology:

(Consult a Neurologist)

Amygdala up, prefrontal cortex down
Belonging + survival circuits dominate
Meaning gets compressed and polarized

Accuracy returns only when the identity feels safe again.

Fast ways to unwind identity-threat distortions

Name the threatened identity explicitly(“This feels like a threat to my competence / goodness / belonging.”)
Differentiate self from position(“I can revise a belief without erasing myself.”)
Restore temporal depth(“What would this look like in 6 months if I adapt rather than defend?”)
Regulate first, reason second Logic doesn’t land until the body exits threat mode.

Clinical tell (useful in therapy)

If reasoning becomes:

Urgent
Absolute
Morally loaded
Defensive of belonging

You’re not in belief, updating mode, you’re in identity-protection mode.

Shervan K Shahhian