relationships – LIBERTY PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Early Attachment Disruption, what is it:

Early Attachment Disruption refers to disturbances in the bond between an infant and their primary caregiver during the first years of life, especially when the caregiver is inconsistent, neglectful, intrusive, frightening, or emotionally unavailable.

Because early attachment shapes the developing nervous system, identity, and emotional regulation, disruption at this stage can have long-lasting psychological effects.

What Is “Attachment”?

Attachment is the child’s biological drive to seek safety and regulation through proximity to a caregiver. A secure attachment teaches the nervous system:

“I am safe.”

“My needs matter.”

“Others are reliable.”

“Emotions can be regulated.”

When this process is disrupted, the child adapts, but often in survival-based ways.

What Causes Early Attachment Disruption?
Common causes include:

Chronic emotional neglect

Maternal depression

Substance abuse in caregivers

Abuse (physical, sexual, emotional)

Institutionalization (e.g., orphanages)

Frequent separations

Frightened or frightening caregiver behavior

Unresolved caregiver trauma

Disruption can happen even when material needs are met. Emotional attunement is key.

Types of Attachment Patterns That May Develop
When early attachment is unstable, children often develop:

Insecure-Avoidant
Caregiver emotionally unavailable: child suppresses needs.
Insecure-Ambivalent (Anxious)
Caregiver inconsistent: child becomes hypervigilant and clingy.
Disorganized Attachment
Caregiver is source of both safety and fear: child shows contradictory behaviors.
Often linked to trauma.

Disorganized attachment is strongly associated with later dissociation and identity instability, themes you’ve been exploring in recent questions.

Psychological Effects in Adulthood
Early attachment disruption can manifest as:

Emotional instability

Chronic anxiety or panic

Fear of abandonment

Traumatic attachment patterns

Identity diffusion

Dissociative tendencies

Difficulty trusting

Existential insecurity

At a nervous system level:
The system may remain in chronic hyperarousal, shutdown, or oscillation.

Neurobiological Impact

Early relational stress affects:

“CONSULT A NEUROLOGIST/MEDICAL DOCTOR“

Stress-response systems (HPA axis)
Limbic system development
Right-hemisphere regulation
Vagal tone
Implicit memory networks

In other words, attachment disruption is not just psychological, it is embodied.

Can It Be Healed?

Maybe, through corrective relational experiences.

Healing often may involves:

Trauma-informed therapy
Somatic regulation work
Consistent, safe relationships
Mentalization and reflective capacity
Gradual exposure to intimacy without overwhelm

Earned secure attachment is possible.

Early attachment shapes not only emotional regulation but the basic structure of the self, the felt sense of being real, continuous, and safe in existence.

Shervan K Shahhian

Traumatic Attachment, what is it:

Traumatic attachment (often called trauma bonding) is a strong emotional attachment that develops between a person and someone who mistreats, abuses, or intermittently harms them.

It is not just “staying in a bad relationship.” It is a psychological bond reinforced by cycles of fear, relief, hope, and reward.

What Is Traumatic Attachment?

Traumatic attachment occurs when:

There is abuse, neglect, or emotional harm
The harmful person is also a source of comfort, love, or safety
The relationship includes intermittent reinforcement (kindness mixed with cruelty)
The victim becomes increasingly dependent

This creates a powerful attachment that can feel like love, but is rooted in survival dynamics.

How It Forms

From an attachment theory perspective:

Humans are wired to attach to caregivers or attachment figures.
When safety and threat come from the same person, the nervous system becomes confused.
The brain prioritizes connection for survival, even if the connection is harmful.
“Consult a Neurologist“
Stress hormones spike during conflict.
Relief or affection releases dopamine and oxytocin.
The cycle creates a chemical addiction pattern similar to gambling reinforcement.

The unpredictability strengthens the bond.

Signs of Traumatic Attachment

Defending or rationalizing the abuser
Intense loyalty despite repeated harm
Feeling unable to leave, even when you want to
Mistaking intensity for love
Craving the “good moments” after abuse
Fear of abandonment greater than fear of harm
Self-blame for the other person’s behavior

Common Contexts

Abusive romantic relationships
Narcissistic or coercive dynamics
Parent-child relationships with inconsistent care
Cult-like or high-control environments
Hostage-like psychological situations

How It Differs from Healthy Attachment

Healthy attachment:

Stable
Predictable
Safe
Allows autonomy

Traumatic attachment:

Intense
Chaotic
Fear-based
Identity-eroding

Healthy love feels secure.
Trauma bonds feel urgent.

Why It’s So Hard to Break

Breaking a traumatic attachment can feel like:

Withdrawal from addiction
Losing your identity
Psychological free fall
Existential panic

The nervous system equates separation with danger.

Clinical Insight

Disorganized attachment
Repetition compulsion
Trauma reenactment
Object constancy deficits
Developmental trauma

It’s not weakness, it’s a survival adaptation that became maladaptive.

Shervan K Shahhian

Borderline-Level Defenses, what are they:

Borderline-level defenses are a group of psychological defense mechanisms that are more primitive than neurotic defenses but more organized than psychotic defenses. They are typically associated with borderline personality organization.

These defenses are common in individuals with intense emotional instability, identity diffusion, and unstable relationships, but they can also appear temporarily in highly stressed individuals.

Core Borderline-Level Defenses

1. Splitting

Seeing people (or oneself) as all good or all bad, with no middle ground.

“They are perfect.”
Later: “They are evil.”

This reflects difficulty integrating positive and negative aspects of the same person.

2. Projective Identification

Not just projecting unwanted feelings onto someone else, but subtly behaving in ways that pressure the other person to actually feel or enact what is projected.

Example:

A person unconsciously feels anger.
They accuse the therapist of hostility.
Their behavior becomes provocative.
The therapist starts feeling irritated.

3. Primitive Idealization

Overvaluing someone unrealistically:

“You are the only person who understands me.”
“You are extraordinary.”

Often followed by devaluation when disappointment occurs.

4. Devaluation

The flip side of idealization.

Sudden shift to: “You are useless.”
Intense contempt or dismissal.

5. Denial (Primitive Form)

Refusal to acknowledge emotionally threatening reality, even when evidence is clear.

6. Omnipotence

An exaggerated sense of power or specialness to defend against vulnerability.

“I don’t need anyone.”
“Rules don’t apply to me.”

Structural Context

Borderline-level organization includes:

Identity diffusion (unstable self-concept)
Primitive defenses (like splitting)
Intact reality testing (unlike psychosis)

This differs from:

Neurotic organization: repression, rationalization
Psychotic organization: severe reality distortion

Clinical Insight

Borderline-level defenses often appear in contexts of:

Intense attachment needs
Fear of abandonment
Grandiose or persecutory relational narratives
Rapid shifts in perception of mentors, institutions, or belief systems

Importantly, these defenses are not “bad”, they are protective adaptations formed early in development, often in response to inconsistent or traumatic attachment.

Shervan K Shahhian

Trauma-Informed Premarital Framework, explained:

A Trauma-Informed Premarital Framework adapts traditional premarital counseling to explicitly account for attachment injury, developmental trauma, relational trauma, and dissociation, rather than assuming two mostly secure, self-regulating partners. Below is a clinically rigorous, integrative framework you can use for assessment, psychoeducation, and intervention.

Core Assumptions (Trauma-Informed Shift)

Traditional premarital models assume:

Conflict = skills deficit

Intimacy avoidance = immaturity

Reactivity = poor communication

A trauma-informed model assumes:

Conflict often = threat activation

Avoidance = nervous system protection

Reactivity = implicit memory discharge

This reframes “compatibility” as capacity for co-regulation and repair, not just shared values.

Framework Overview (6 Domains)

1. Attachment & Developmental History Mapping

Goal: Identify implicit relational templates before commitment.

Assess:

Childhood attachment style (earned vs insecure)

Caregiver unpredictability, role reversal, emotional neglect

Prior relational trauma (betrayal, abandonment, coercion)

Key questions:

What does closeness activate for you , relief or vigilance?

What does conflict predict in your body , repair or rupture?

Red flags:

Idealization without differentiation

“I don’t need anyone” narratives

Trauma bonding misread as chemistry

2. Nervous System Profiles & Trigger Cycles

Goal: Make implicit threat responses explicit.

Map:

Fight / flight / freeze / fawn patterns

Somatic cues preceding conflict

Typical escalation loops (e.g., pursuer–withdrawer)

Intervention:

Create a shared trigger map

Name states as states, not identities

Reframe:

“You’re not incompatible , you’re dysregulated together.”

3. Conflict Meaning & Repair Capacity

Goal: Assess rupture tolerance, not conflict avoidance.

Evaluate:

Ability to stay present under emotional load

Repair attempts after rupture

Time-to-repair duration

Trauma marker:

Conflict = existential threat (“This means we’re doomed”)

Stonewalling, dissociation, or catastrophic meaning-making

Practice:

Structured rupture, repair rehearsals

Post-conflict debriefs focused on state shifts, not blame

4. Boundaries, Autonomy & Enmeshment Risk

Goal: Prevent reenactment of control or fusion dynamics.

Assess:

Differentiation under stress

Guilt around saying no

Rescue / caretaker roles

Watch for:

“We do everything together”

One partner regulating the other’s emotions

Identity loss framed as devotion

Trauma-informed boundary reframe:

Boundaries are nervous system stabilizers, not walls.

5. Intimacy, Sexuality & Trauma Imprints

Goal: De-shame trauma-coded intimacy patterns.

Explore:

Desire discrepancies

Sexual shutdown or compulsivity

Trauma-linked arousal vs secure desire

Normalize:

Arousal ≠ consent ≠ safety

Love can feel boring when trauma equates intensity with connection

Interventions:

Sensate-focus style exercises with opt-out normalization

Explicit consent language practice

6. Meaning-Making, Values & Narrative Integration

Goal: Align future orientation without bypassing trauma.

Assess:

How each partner explains suffering

Spiritual or existential beliefs about love, sacrifice, permanence

Red flag:

“Marriage will heal me”

Redemption-through-relationship narratives

Reframe:

Marriage amplifies existing regulation patterns , it doesn’t replace them.

Readiness Indicators (Trauma-Informed)

A couple is premaritally ready when:

Both can name their own triggers without defensiveness

Repair happens without coercion or withdrawal

Each partner can self-regulate for short periods

Trauma is owned, not outsourced to the relationship

Contraindications for Marriage (at Present)

Not moral judgments , timing signals:

Active untreated PTSD with relational flashbacks

Ongoing addiction or compulsive dissociation

Recurrent emotional or psychological abuse

One partner acting as therapist, parent, or regulator

Integration With Existing Models

This framework can overlay:

Gottman to add nervous system literacy

EFT to add trauma-paced titration

IMAGO to reduce reenactment romanticization

Internal Family Systems to dyadic parts mapping

Clinical Stance Slow the process

Normalize ambivalence

Privilege felt safety over insight

Treat “love” as a capacity, not just an emotion

Shervan K Shahhian

Understanding Conditional Attachment:

Conditional attachment refers to a relational pattern where connection, care, or safety is experienced as dependent on meeting certain conditions—rather than being reliably available.

In short: “I’m attached if I perform, comply, please, succeed, stay regulated, or don’t need too much.”

Core features

Love = earned, not given
Attachment is contingent on behavior, mood, usefulness, or achievement
Safety feels revocable
The nervous system stays on watch for cues of withdrawal or disapproval

How it forms

Most often develops in environments where caregivers:

Gave affection selectively (praise for success, withdrawal for failure)
Were emotionally available only when the child was “easy,” calm, or impressive
Used approval, attention, or closeness as regulation tools
Rewarded compliance and punished authenticity (emotion, need, protest)

The child learns:

“To stay connected, I must manage myself—and often you.”

Common adult expressions

People-pleasing, over-functioning, or perfectionism
Hyper-attunement to others’ moods
Fear of being “too much” or “not enough”
Collapse, shame, or anger when needs arise
Relationships that feel transactional rather than resting

Nervous system angle

Conditional attachment keeps the system in sympathetic vigilance or freeze-compliance:

Attachment = threat + reward
Proximity doesn’t fully down-regulate
Safety is never assumed—only temporarily granted

This is why even “good” relationships can feel tiring or precarious.

Contrast: secure attachment

Conditional	Secure
Love must be maintained	Love is assumed
Safety is earned	Safety is baseline
Authenticity risks loss	Authenticity deepens bond
Needs feel dangerous	Needs are welcomed

Healing direction

Repair isn’t about “detaching” but re-patterning attachment:

Experiences of non-contingent presence (“I’m here even if nothing changes”)
Learning to tolerate being seen without performing
Nervous-system level safety before insight
Relational repair where rupture ≠ abandonment

Given your trauma and phenomenology-focused lens, conditional attachment is best understood not as a belief problem, but as a learned survival contract the body once needed.

Shervan K Shahhian

Global Self-Condemnation, what is it?

Global self-condemnation is a cognitive–emotional pattern in which a person judges their entire self as bad, defective, or unworthy based on specific mistakes, traits, or experiences.

Rather than thinking “I did something wrong,” the person concludes “I am wrong.”

Core Characteristics

Totalizing self-judgment: One flaw, failure, or behavior is taken as evidence that the whole self is bad.
Stable and global: The judgment feels permanent (“always,” “fundamentally”) and applies across contexts.
Moralized shame: Not just regret or guilt, but a sense of being inherently corrupt or unredeemable.
Resistant to evidence: Positive feedback or success doesn’t disconfirm the belief.

Common Forms

“I am a bad person.”
“There’s something wrong with me at my core.”
“If people really knew me, they’d reject me.”
“My past defines who I am.”

How It Differs From Related Constructs

Guilt → Behavior-focused (“I did something wrong”)
Shame → Self-focused but situational (“I feel bad about who I was then”)
Global self-condemnation → Identity-level and absolute (“I am bad, period”)

In CBT terms, it’s a global self-rating error.
In trauma psychology, it often reflects internalized blame or attachment injury.
In psychodynamic language, it resembles a harsh superego or introjected critical object.

Developmental & Trauma Links

Chronic criticism or moral shaming in childhood
Conditional attachment (“you’re lovable only if…”)
Religious or ideological absolutism
Trauma where self-blame preserved a sense of control
Environments where mistakes threatened belonging or safety

Psychological Functions (Why It Persists)

Paradoxically, global self-condemnation can:

Create a false sense of control (“If I’m bad, at least it makes sense”)
Prevent hope (which would risk disappointment)
Maintain attachment to critical caregivers or belief systems
Serve as a protective identity against vulnerability

Clinical Markers

Language of essence rather than action
Difficulty accepting compassion
Collapse into shame after minor errors
Strong resistance to self-forgiveness
Identity fusion with past behavior or symptoms

Therapeutic Reframes

Effective work usually involves:

De-globalizing identity (separating self from actions)
Restoring moral complexity (good people can do harmful things)
Contextualizing origins (how the belief once protected the person)
Developing self-compassion without bypassing responsibility
Relational repair (being seen without condemnation)

A key shift is from moral absolutism to human fallibility.

Shervan K Shahhian

Does Shame Narrows Perception, why:

Shame narrows perception because it is a high-intensity social threat response that shifts the brain and nervous system from open, integrative processing into defensive survival mode.

Here’s how that happens, layer by layer:

1. Shame Activates the Social Threat System

Shame signals “I am unacceptable; I may be rejected or expelled from the group.”
Because social belonging is essential for survival, the brain treats shame like danger.

Neurobiologically (Consult a Neurologist):

The amygdala and threat circuits activate
Stress hormones (cortisol, norepinephrine) increase
The prefrontal cortex (perspective-taking, nuance, mental flexibility) goes partially offline

Result: the mind prioritizes self-protection, not exploration or complexity.

2. Attention Collapses Inward

Under shame, attention narrows toward:

The self as an object of judgment
Perceived flaws, mistakes, or exposures
Imagined evaluations by others

This produces:

Tunnel vision
Loss of contextual awareness
Reduced ability to mentalize others accurately

Instead of “What is happening?” the question becomes “What’s wrong with me?”

3. Temporal Constriction

Shame compresses time:

Past mistakes feel ever-present
The future feels foreclosed or catastrophic
The present feels frozen

This is why shame often feels inescapable and global rather than specific or momentary.

4. Meaning-Making Becomes Rigid

Shame pushes cognition toward:

Global self-condemnation (“I am bad,” not “I did something”)
Black-and-white thinking
Certainty without curiosity

This rigidity protects against further exposure but blocks learning, repair, and growth.

5. Nervous System Immobilization

From a polyvagal perspective:

Shame often activates dorsal vagal shutdown or a collapsed sympathetic state
Energy drops
Voice, posture, and gaze constrict
Sensory richness diminishes

Perception narrows because the body is preparing to hide, disappear, or endure.

6. Developmental Roots

Many people learned early that:

Visibility led to humiliation or punishment
Being seen meant danger

So the nervous system learned:
“Narrow awareness = safety.”

Shame becomes a perceptual strategy, not just an emotion.

In Short

Shame narrows perception because:

It is designed to prevent social exile
It shifts the brain into threat-based efficiency
It collapses attention, time, and meaning to minimize risk

It is not a failure of insight.
It is survival intelligence doing exactly what it evolved to do—at the cost of openness.

Clinically Useful Reframe

Shame doesn’t mean “something is wrong with you.”
It means “your system believes visibility is unsafe right now.”

Restoring perception requires safety, attunement, and relational repair, not insight alone.

Shervan K Shahhian

Healthy Masculinity, explained:

Healthy Masculinity refers to ways of being male that are grounded, integrated, emotionally mature, and ethical, rather than rigid, aggressive, or suppressive. It is not the opposite of femininity, nor is it defined by dominance or toughness. Instead, it reflects inner strength, responsibility, relational capacity, and self-regulation.

Below is a clear, Mental Health grounded framework.

Core Elements of Healthy Masculinity

1. Emotional Literacy

Can identify, tolerate, and express emotions without shame
Understands that vulnerability is a form of courage, not weakness
Regulates anger rather than acting it out or suppressing it

Key shift: From emotional repression → emotional mastery

2. Secure Strength

Confidence comes from self-knowledge, not comparison or control
Strength includes restraint, patience, and protection
Can stand firm without needing to dominate

Healthy strength = power with conscience

3. Accountability & Integrity

Takes responsibility for actions and their impact
Makes repairs when harm is caused
Aligns behavior with values, even under pressure

4. Relational Capacity

Can form deep, mutual relationships with partners, friends, and children
Listens without defensiveness
Sees others as subjects, not objects or threats

5. Boundary Awareness

Respects others’ autonomy and consent
Sets clear boundaries without aggression or withdrawal
Understands that limits create safety, not rejection

6. Purpose & Contribution

Channels energy into meaningful work, service, or creativity
Seeks to contribute rather than prove
Understands legacy in relational and ethical terms, not dominance

7. Integration of Masculine & Feminine Capacities

Balances assertiveness with empathy
Action with reflection
Logic with intuition

Healthy masculinity is integrative, not polarized.

What Healthy Masculinity Is Not

Not emotional numbness
Not domination or entitlement
Not avoidance of intimacy
Not aggression disguised as confidence

Psychological Perspective

From attachment and depth psychology:

Healthy masculinity aligns with secure attachment
Trauma-based masculinity often reflects fight, freeze, or dissociative defenses
Developmentally, healthy masculinity emerges when boys are allowed both agency and emotional connection

In One Sentence

Healthy masculinity is the capacity to hold strength and tenderness simultaneously, to act with power guided by conscience, and to remain relational rather than defensive.

Shervan K Shahhian

Trauma-Informed Premarital Framework, explained:

Core Assumptions (Trauma-Informed Shift)
Traditional premarital models assume:

Conflict = skills deficit

Intimacy avoidance = immaturity

Reactivity = poor communication

A trauma-informed model assumes:

Conflict often = threat activation

Avoidance = nervous system protection

Reactivity = implicit memory discharge

This reframes “compatibility” as capacity for co-regulation and repair, not just shared values.

Framework Overview (6 Domains)
1. Attachment & Developmental History Mapping
Goal: Identify implicit relational templates before commitment.

Assess:

Childhood attachment style (earned vs insecure)

Caregiver unpredictability, role reversal, emotional neglect

Prior relational trauma (betrayal, abandonment, coercion)

Key questions:

What does closeness activate for you , relief or vigilance?

What does conflict predict in your body , repair or rupture?

Red flags:

Idealization without differentiation

“I don’t need anyone” narratives

Trauma bonding misread as chemistry

2. Nervous System Profiles & Trigger Cycles
Goal: Make implicit threat responses explicit.

Map:

Fight / flight / freeze / fawn patterns

Somatic cues preceding conflict

Typical escalation loops (e.g., pursuer–withdrawer)

Intervention:

Create a shared trigger map

Name states as states, not identities

Reframe:

“You’re not incompatible , you’re dysregulated together.”

3. Conflict Meaning & Repair Capacity
Goal: Assess rupture tolerance, not conflict avoidance.

Evaluate:

Ability to stay present under emotional load

Repair attempts after rupture

Time-to-repair duration

Trauma marker:

Conflict = existential threat (“This means we’re doomed”)

Stonewalling, dissociation, or catastrophic meaning-making

Practice:

Structured rupture, repair rehearsals

Post-conflict debriefs focused on state shifts, not blame

4. Boundaries, Autonomy & Enmeshment Risk
Goal: Prevent reenactment of control or fusion dynamics.

Assess:

Differentiation under stress

Guilt around saying no

Rescue / caretaker roles

Watch for:

“We do everything together”

One partner regulating the other’s emotions

Identity loss framed as devotion

Trauma-informed boundary reframe:

Boundaries are nervous system stabilizers, not walls.

5. Intimacy, Sexuality & Trauma Imprints
Goal: De-shame trauma-coded intimacy patterns.

Explore:

Desire discrepancies

Sexual shutdown or compulsivity

Trauma-linked arousal vs secure desire

Normalize:

Arousal ≠ consent ≠ safety

Love can feel boring when trauma equates intensity with connection

Interventions:

Sensate-focus style exercises with opt-out normalization

Explicit consent language practice

6. Meaning-Making, Values & Narrative Integration
Goal: Align future orientation without bypassing trauma.

Assess:

How each partner explains suffering

Spiritual or existential beliefs about love, sacrifice, permanence

Red flag:

“Marriage will heal me”

Redemption-through-relationship narratives

Reframe:

Marriage amplifies existing regulation patterns , it doesn’t replace them.

Readiness Indicators (Trauma-Informed)
A couple is premaritally ready when:

Both can name their own triggers without defensiveness

Repair happens without coercion or withdrawal

Each partner can self-regulate for short periods

Trauma is owned, not outsourced to the relationship

Contraindications for Marriage (at Present)
Not moral judgments , timing signals:

Active untreated PTSD with relational flashbacks

Ongoing addiction or compulsive dissociation

Recurrent emotional or psychological abuse

One partner acting as therapist, parent, or regulator

Integration With Existing Models
This framework can overlay:

Gottman to add nervous system literacy

EFT to add trauma-paced titration

IMAGO to reduce reenactment romanticization

Internal Family Systems to dyadic parts mapping

Clinical Stance
Slow the process

Normalize ambivalence

Privilege felt safety over insight

Treat “love” as a capacity, not just an emotion

Shervan K Shahhian

Understanding Accurate Empathic Attunement:

Accurate Empathic Attunement refers to the therapist’s (or helper’s) ability to deeply sense, understand, and respond to a client’s inner emotional world in a way that feels precisely aligned with what the client is actually experiencing — not merely what the therapist imagines or assumes they feel.

Here’s a breakdown of what it means:

1. Definition

Accurate empathic attunement is the moment-to-moment sensitivity to the subtle shifts in a client’s emotional state, and the ability to reflect those feelings back with clarity, warmth, and precision. It is empathy in action, combined with accuracy — the therapist “tunes in” to the emotional wavelength of the client.

2. Core Elements

Empathic Understanding: Feeling with the client — sensing their inner world as if it were your own.
Accuracy: Distinguishing between your perception and the client’s actual experience; checking that your understanding matches theirs.
Attunement: Responding in a way that resonates emotionally — tone, pace, words, and presence all match the client’s state.

3. Example in Practice

Client: “I just feel like no matter what I do, I disappoint everyone.”
Therapist (with accurate empathic attunement):
“It sounds like you’re carrying a heavy sense of letting people down — almost like you can’t get it right, even when you try.”

(The therapist captures both the sadness and the self-blame — not just the words.)

If the therapist instead said:
“Sounds like you’re frustrated that others don’t appreciate you,”
— that would be inaccurate attunement because it misses the client’s deeper emotion (shame, not frustration).

4. Psychological Impact

Accurate empathic attunement:

Creates a deep sense of safety and trust.
Helps clients feel seen and validated.
Encourages emotional regulation and self-understanding.
Strengthens the therapeutic alliance — the foundation of healing.

5. In Summary

Accurate empathic attunement is the therapist’s finely tuned emotional radar — sensing not just what a client feels, but how deeply and in what way they feel it, and then mirroring it back with precision and care.

Shervan K Shahhian